[NA-Discuss] [At-Large] I do not own it, it belongs to everyone, so let me make money selling it!
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Sun Aug 10 21:51:17 EDT 2008
JFC and all,
JFC, surely as a Frenchman you recognize that age old lady of the
evening creed: "No money no honey, come back pay day"?
Such is and as you should have known long ago, is the unspoken
and unwritten creed of ICANN. All to sad, yes, but all too true.
JFC Morfin wrote:
> How nice this "Internet for the Rich". I love the Anglo-Saxon
> practical money inductive reasoning ... There are definitly different
> cultures on this list : "I sell", "I do", "I follow", "we wait for
> the best opportunity for us", "may be, we could share".
> We will see who is the winner.
> jfc
>
> At 23:20 10/08/2008, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> >Patrick and Hong, I find your comments a strong over-reaction.
> >
> >The issue that is being discussed is how to handle the situation of
> >multiple people applying for the same TLD, and they cannot come to an
> >agreement amongst themselves. Classic examples are ".web" and ".mail"
> >but there are plenty of other examples.
> >
> >The paper discusses the various ways of addressing such conflicts,
> >and comes to the conclusion that auctions are probably the preferable
> >path. If you disagree with this, that is fine. The only seeming
> >practical alternative is a subjective analysis of which is the best
> >for the overall good of the Internet or the communities or whatever
> >(the so-called beauty contest). I find that alternative far too
> >fraught with potential problems, but if that is what you favour, it
> >would be interesting to hear how you think it can be done properly.
> >
> >Using an auction to resolve the conflict does indeed mean that .web
> >will not likely go to a small not-for-profit organization. If that is
> >your concern, then in my mind, you are being somewhat unrealistic.
> >
> >On the positive side, the possible auctions of these relatively few
> >high-profile TLDs will likely bring in a LOT of money. It has
> >repeatedly been suggested that this wind-fall profit not be simply
> >wrapped into ICANN general funds, or even used to offset the costs of
> >offering new gTLDs. But rather it be used to (with appropriate
> >caution) make it less expensive and less onerous for not-for-profits,
> >cultural communities and developing countries folks to acquire new gTLDs.
> >
> >Now THAT is something that I think At-Large should make a strong
> >statement about.
> >
> >Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list