[NA-Discuss] GNSO reform and ALAC
Ross Rader
ross at tucows.com
Wed Apr 23 11:11:22 EDT 2008
Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> What a farce.
>
> Whether or not the document is any good
It isn't. It completely marginalizes the individual registrant and user
communities by shifting most of the power to the commercial
user/commercial registrant community (read: IPC/ISPC/BC).
I think the paper is correct in pointing out that contracted parties do
need some sort of grouping, but it forgets that registrants (of all
types) are a highly important component of this. My strongest preference
has always been to provide the contracted parties with 1/2 of the vote
of the Council, and the user community with the other 1/2. How the 1/2s
get divided up is a matter for discussion, but I think its time for a
serious discussion of these matters before some half-baked scheme like
this commercial power grab gets institutionalized.
Sorry for cross posting this - not sure where this thread should
actually live.
/ross
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list