[NA-Discuss] [At-Large] Results of the Voting for ALAC NominatingCommittee 2008 Appointments

[Danny Younger]

Wendy,

As Robert on the NCUC list has revealed that you were
one of the parties consulted in a process that led to
the removal of a candidate from the voting roster, I
can understand why you might wish to bury the issue.

Sorry, but electoral fraud, an illegal interference
with the process of an election, is a serious matter
that can't just be swept under the carpet like it
never happened.  Removing a candidate from the roster
for no legitimate reason is illegal interference.  It
should not be condoned on the pretext of needing to
move on.

regards,
Danny


--- Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com> wrote:

> Danny,
> 
> As you have always been one of the strongest voices
> in counseling us to 
> focus on policy rather than infighting, I hope you
> will also help us to 
> leave behind personal attacks and work with us to
> make the ALAC more 
> responsive to the at-large community.  With work, I
> hope we can minimize 
> such feelings of miscommunication in the future.
> 
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
> 
> Danny Younger wrote:
> > Robert Guerra on the NARALO discussion list has
> > revealed that "Consultations were done with key
> people
> > active on the NA list as well as those in ICANN.
> > Consultations were done privately on a one-to-one
> > basis."
> > 
> > These consultations with "those in ICANN" resulted
> in
> > a duly nominated and confirmed candidate being
> removed
> > from the voting roster.
> > 
> > I find it highly disturbing that elected members
> of
> > the NARALO feel at liberty to consult with "those
> in
> > ICANN" without engaging in any consultation with
> those
> > in the NARALO membership.
> > 
> > Who are "those in ICANN" that were consulted?  Are
> > ICANN Board members or ICANN Staff complicit in a
> > process to rig the ALAC elections?  Or is Robert
> > referring to others?  It is his wish that those
> > consultations remain privileged.
> > 
> > We deserve a full investigation into this matter. 
> I
> > remain of the view that a legitimate candidate was
> > treatly unfairly and that at the very least the
> > Ombudsman should be called in to review this
> matter.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >        
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you
> sell. 
> > http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
> > 
> > ------
> > NA-Discuss mailing list
> > NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > Visit the NA-RALO Wiki at
> https://st.icann.org/naralo/
> > ------
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> phone: +1.914.374.0613 // office: 617.373.7331
> Visiting Professor, Northeastern University School
> of Law
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> http://www.torproject.org/
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more!
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658