[NA-Discuss] Fwd: [NA-ALS] Call for Statements of Interest | NA RALO Seats on ALAC

Fri Jun 22 23:47:15 EDT 2007

Quick question - according to the OP, the potential pool of candidates is
limited to members of an ALS or "unaffiliated individuals) - how are those
unaffiliated individuals counted - any natural person living in NA region
and not a member of an ALS and subscribed to the list? 

Any length of time requirements for list membership - i.e. can I see the
call on a website, join the list and nominate - all in the same day for
example?  

The reason I ask is that - if the latter is acceptable by the OP, then yes
the call should have been widely disseminated, so people could join the list
and then be nominated. If not, if the only people who are eligible are
people who are already members of the list, then maybe sending the
information to the members of the list would be OK.

Also in 11 in the OP, it does not specify who exactly is the North American
Internet Community - if it's the members of the RALO (ALSes and unaffiliated
individuals) or the wider public.

Jacqueline

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 4:23 PM
To: Thompson, Darlene; Evan Leibovitch
Cc: NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fwd: [NA-ALS] Call for Statements of Interest | NA
RALO Seats on ALAC

Darlene,

The Call for Statements of Interest was not posted on
the NARALO website, it was not posted on the ALAC
website, it was not posted on the ICANN website;
neither was it posted on ICANN's public participation
website, nor in the ICANN Blog.  It was not in an
ICANN newsletter, nor in an ICANN news alert nor in an
at-large newsletter.  

Confining the Call only to subscribers of this list
was patently unfair and remains unacceptable.  A
complaint will be lodged.  

--- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson at gov.nu.ca> wrote:

> Evan, I believe that we *have* ratified the OP and
> Code of Conduct.  That didn't need to be approved by
> ICANN staff as it was the NARALO Operating
> Principals and Code of Conduct and ICANN has no say
> in same.  The MOU is totally different as it is an
> agreement between the NARALO and ICANN.
>  
> Danny, if outreach was to be done, why was it not
> done in the last few years when there were people
> sitting on their hands on this list and not doing
> it.  Outreach is up to the ALSs.  If that hasn't
> been done yet, I cannot see that by throwing up this
> artificial and transparent roadblock now is
> acceptable.
>  
> I understand how upset you must be at not being
> approved as an ALS but please stop trying to stymie
> this process that the majority of us want to pursue.
>  
> Darlene
> Sitting in the Ottawa Airport, waiting for my flight
> >sigh<
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on
> behalf of Evan Leibovitch
> Sent: Fri 6/22/2007 2:20 PM
> Cc: NA Discuss
> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fwd: [NA-ALS] Call for
> Statements of Interest | NA RALO Seats on ALAC
> 
> 
> 
> Gareth Shearman wrote:
> 
> > I was under the impression that we have ratified
> the operating 
> > principles and it is now just the MOU that needs
> to be finished?
> >  
> I don't think that anything has been formally
> ratified -- that requires
> agreement by both NARALO members and ICANN staff. 
> Having said that,  it
> appears that we've generally agreed on wording for
> the OP and are close
> to it on the MOU.
> 
> Unless there are some serious roadblocks -- most of
> which have been
> cleared AFAIK -- ratification could come as early as
> the in-person
> meeting on Sunday.
> 
> - Evan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica
nn.org
> ---
> Draft MoU with ICANN:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
> 
> Draft Operating Principles:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
> 
> Draft Code of Conduct:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica
nn.org
> ---
> Draft MoU with ICANN:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
> 
> Draft Operating Principles:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
> 
> Draft Code of Conduct:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct

____________________________________________________________________________
________
Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car
Finder tool.
http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/

_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica
nn.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU

Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP

Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.4/860 - Release Date: 6/21/2007
5:53 PM

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.4/860 - Release Date: 6/21/2007
5:53 PM