[NA-Discuss] ICANN Budget Questions

Nick Ashton-Hart nick.ashton-hart at icann.org
Thu Jun 14 17:18:02 EDT 2007


Danny:

With regret, I will not be able to procure this information for you  
until after the ICANN meeting. I recommend that you address this  
question in this instance to those contact addresses associated with  
the budget as that'll get you the information you seek much more  
quickly...

On 14 Jun 2007, at 21:02, Danny Younger wrote:

> Nick,
>
> (1) The FY 2007-2008 Revenue Projection notes the
> Annual Registrar Accreditation Fees category and
> states in a footnote that the values are "Based upon
> reduction to approximately 600 registrars".
>
> As we now have 895 accredited registrars -- see
> http://www.icann.org/registrars/accredited-list.html
> -- on what basis does ICANN Staff believe that we will
> encounter this type of a dramatic reduction in the
> number of accredited registrars?
>
> (2)  I don't see funds allocated to the outcome of the
> multiple reviews of ICANN structures and operations
> (as in changes that may stem from the GNSO review, the
> ALAC review, the NonCom review, the Board review,
> etc.)  Where are those planned expenditures cited?
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222




More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list