[NA-Discuss] Voting Update

[Michael Maranda]

I am stating a view, not engaging in debate.  I dont see a reason to state
the matter as you have.  The percentage of Latino's in Chicago (for example)
dwarfs any other non-English linguistic-ethnic group.  Would we send them
to  LAC-RALO?  I also dont think there needs to be further barrier to their
participation.

On 6/5/07, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:
>
> Michael Maranda wrote:
>
> > This would also be appealing for inclusion of a significant proportion
> > of US population.
> If we used that criteria we should then also include Mandarin, Greek,
> Hindi, Italian, and probably a few others.
>
> How often must this subject be re-debated?
>
> - Evan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> ---
> Draft MoU with ICANN:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
>
> Draft Operating Principles:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
>
> Draft Code of Conduct:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director, CTCNet Chicago Chapter
Co-Founder, Chicago Digital Access Alliance
Co-Chair, Illinois Community Technology Coalition
President, Association For Community Networking

Support the efforts of the Chicago Digital Access Alliance:
http://www.digitalaccessalliance.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20070605/e7b58c9f/attachment.html