[NA-Discuss] icannalac.org website

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

On 4 Jul 2007, at 18:05, Jean Armour Polly wrote:

> At 8:37 AM +0100 7/4/07, Nick Ashton-Hart recently said:
>> As the Committee has been repeatedly informed, the situation is  
>> that anyone being paid by ICANN must have anything they post  
>> publicly approved via the GCs office.
>
> What if the webmaster just posted things FROM the committee, from  
> volunteers, would that be OK? In addition, I used to make pointers  
> to news stories around ICANN.org itself, to make documents easier  
> for ALAC members to find. And occasionally I pointed to other posts  
> about other things, like conferences in the Caribbean, ISP  
> providers in Africa, etc. There is a difference in these sorts of  
> tasks, as opposed to acting as a "speaker" for ICANN.
>

No - it would still need to be cleared through legal if the poster  
was paid by ICANN.