[NA-Discuss] NA-Discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1 - It Was A Pleasure
Seth M. Reiss
seth.reiss at lex-ip.com
Sun Jul 1 17:57:10 EDT 2007
I agree with Robert (surprise?) that it was a real pleasure meeting everyone
and I also join Robert in applauding ICANN for getting us all there. I look
forward to continuing to work with you all towards many more successes for
NARALO, ALAC and ICANN.
By the way, does anyone know where I can find the Kayaking website and
photos?
Seth
-----Original Message-----
From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
na-discuss-request at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 3:37 AM
To: na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: NA-Discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1
Send NA-Discuss mailing list submissions to
na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica
nn.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
na-discuss-request at atlarge-lists.icann.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
na-discuss-owner at atlarge-lists.icann.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of NA-Discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: .mobi, was San Juan Meeting (John L)
2. Re: status of .aero (John L)
3. A pleasure to finally meet all of you... (Robert Guerra)
4. Re: status of .aero (Dharma Dailey)
5. Draft: GNSO Reform proposal (Robert Guerra)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:27:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: John L <johnl at iecc.com>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] .mobi, was San Juan Meeting
To: NA Discuss <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Message-ID: <20070630122641.R61776 at simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> a telco operation). If anyone has any input or comment for the .mobi
> people, I'll be glad to forward it or to put any of you in touch with
them.
Please tell me, too. I've been listening in on some of the .mobi working
groups on ads, email, etc.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com,
ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:31:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: John L <johnl at iecc.com>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] status of .aero
To: "Jacqueline A. Morris" <jam at jacquelinemorris.com>
Cc: 'NA Discuss' <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Message-ID: <20070630122728.X61776 at simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Did anyone ever have a chance to ask this question?
During the meeting, I saw on the ICANN web site that Ed Hasbrouck goaded the
ICANN staff into revealing two hitherto secret amendments giving six-month
extensions of the existing .aero agreement, signed on behalf of ICANN by
Kurt Pritz.
There is nothing the board minutes related to .aero since a 2006 motion that
directs the staff to negotiate a new agreement. I believe that all previous
registry agreements and amendments have been subject to board vote, so I
wish I had a chance to ask how come staff now gets to amend this agreement
without telling anyone including, apparently, the board.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com,
ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
> If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO
> (me) would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship
> agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without any
> contractual authority.
>
> Of the three sTLDs that came up for renewal last year, .MUSEUM got a
> six month time extension in March, and .COOP is supposed to be
> reapproved this week, but there's been no action on .AERO since June
> of 2006, a year ago, when the staff was supposed to negotiate a new
agreement.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:29:22 -0400
From: Robert Guerra <lists at privaterra.info>
Subject: [NA-Discuss] A pleasure to finally meet all of you...
To: NA Discuss <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Message-ID: <953F2726-D21B-431D-B2CF-D1B1B4D3D4EB at privaterra.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
First, before anything - i'd like to express to my sincere thanks to ICANN
to make it possible for the ALS's in the NA region to be able to attend the
San Juan ICANN meeting. It was a great pleasure to meet and finally get to
meet all of you. I believe great friendships have developed, something that
is just great.
I believe that our time together has allowed us to develop a mutual respect
and understanding of each other and the different points of view that at
times we have. Personally, I think that we have far more in common then we
realize.
There are great challenges ahead to make At-Large, and indeed ICANN more
open, transparent and effective . Working together as a team, I believe
we'll be able to make a positive impact in At-Large and ICANN as a whole.
in summary - it was an honor to have meet all of you. Thanks for being a
great time. I look forward for all of us working together in the coming days
and weeks.
regards,
Robert
---
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.ca>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:16:02 -0400
From: Dharma Dailey <dharma at ethoswireless.com>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] status of .aero
To: John L <johnl at iecc.com>
Cc: 'NA Discuss' <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Message-ID: <D7A0204A-CB01-4AD7-8B0C-C3EA9DD5B5D8 at ethoswireless.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
I asked in the public forum, "What are the rights of registrants if a
registry goes belly up?"- A much more generic form of your question-
certainly didn't know all the details that you just mentioned. The answer
that I got was very generic as well-- I would summarize about 10 minutes of
several panelists talking as "We're working on it."
-Dharma Dailey.
On Jun 30, 2007, at 12:31 PM, John L wrote:
> Did anyone ever have a chance to ask this question?
>
> During the meeting, I saw on the ICANN web site that Ed Hasbrouck
> goaded the ICANN staff into revealing two hitherto secret amendments
> giving six-month extensions of the existing .aero agreement, signed on
> behalf of ICANN by Kurt Pritz.
>
> There is nothing the board minutes related to .aero since a 2006
> motion that directs the staff to negotiate a new agreement. I believe
> that all previous registry agreements and amendments have been subject
> to board vote, so I wish I had a chance to ask how come staff now gets
> to amend this agreement without telling anyone including, apparently,
> the board.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be,
> http://www.johnlevine.com, ex- Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please",
> said Tom, revealingly.
>
>> If someone has a chance at the public forum, a registrant in .AERO
>> (me)
>> would like to know the status of the domain. The sponsorship
>> agreement expired in 2006, so at this point it's operating without
>> any contractual authority.
>>
>> Of the three sTLDs that came up for renewal last year, .MUSEUM got a
>> six month time extension in March, and .COOP is supposed to be
>> reapproved this week, but there's been no action on .AERO since June
>> of 2006, a year ago, when the staff was supposed to negotiate a new
>> agreement.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-
> lists.icann.org
> ---
> Draft MoU with ICANN:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
>
> Draft Operating Principles:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
>
> Draft Code of Conduct:
> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 09:36:32 -0400
From: Robert Guerra <lists at privaterra.info>
Subject: [NA-Discuss] Draft: GNSO Reform proposal
To: NA Discuss <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Message-ID: <59A07C75-E849-4158-A712-7EFE09FC20BB at privaterra.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The folks from NCUC have asked for At-Large support on this, as such i'm
forwarding to the list for your comments and review.
regards
Robert
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU>
> Date: July 1, 2007 12:01:51 AM EDT (CA)
> To: NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Draft: GNSO Reform proposal
>
> This document elaborates the ideas about GNSO reform that we discussed
> in San Juan. The GNSO reform proposals that were floating around in
> Puerto Rico have the potential to really solidify some recent
> improvements in ICANN, and they also have the potential to do a lot of
> damage if they go the wrong way. Please give this a look when you get
> a chance. We need to be unified and informed on this issue, and we
> need to get the ALAC people to work together with us.
>
>
>
> Modifications and comments welcome. I think I will propose that once
> we complete this document we do some diagrams and print up a bunch for
> the Los Angeles meeting.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCUC Response to GNSO Reform Questions.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 78336 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org/
attachments/20070701/f8067df8/attachment.doc
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica
nn.org
End of NA-Discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1
****************************************
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list