<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:#0b5394"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(34,34,34)">On 28 May 2017 at 14:34, Glenn McKnight </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(34,34,34)"><<a href="mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com" target="_blank">mcknight.glenn@gmail.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(34,34,34)"> wrote:</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"> <div></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div> the NOMCOM goes through a secondary stage of assessment from ALAC. Our NARALO<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(11,83,148);display:inline"> </div>vote resulted in the <span style="font-family:Symbol"><span style="font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal"> </span></span><span style="background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:10.5pt;color:rgb(51,51,51)">NARALO majority recommending </span><span style="background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:10.5pt">Leah Symekher to the ALAC </span><span style="background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:10.5pt;color:rgb(51,51,51)">as the Delegate to the Nominating Committee for the period of one year beginning at the end of the ICANN60 Meeting in November 2017. Note that ALAC looks at both candidates in coming up with their final decision .</span></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(11,83,148)">There needs to be a compelling reason for the ALAC to not endorse the elected recommendation from a region. Such a rejection is (and should be) rare, and I can't recall it ever happening.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(11,83,148)"></div></div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:10.5pt;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Not absolutely sure when ALAC makes their decision. I will ask Alan Greenberg for timelines. I assume it's at the next ALAC meeting.</span></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(11,83,148)">Typically, the ALAC holds a single vote to endorse the recommended NomCom representatives from all regions at once. It is usually done at the first ALAC meeting held after all regional elections are done.</div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(11,83,148)">- Evan</div><br></div></div>
</div></div>