[NA-Discuss] Congrats
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sun May 28 19:48:12 UTC 2017
The ICANN Bylaws and the ALAC RoP both say that
this NomCom delegates are selected by the ALAC in consultation with the RALOs.
We have had a number of cases over the years
where a RALO has submitted multiple names for the
ALAC to choose, sometimes with a preference or
background reason, and sometimes without. For the
record, that included at least one occurrence
from NARALO. The ALAC may choose the "less
preferred candidate" if there is one, or can go
outside the provided list and select someone else
if the ALAC feels that this is warranted. This
has happened. There is no doubt (in my mind) that
if the ALAC chooses to do this, it will duly
consider the implications (with respect to the RALO) of doing so.
In terms of timing, there is no great rush, as
the names are not needed until the travel
deadline for the November meeting, but the
selection is typically done soon after the names
are provided to the ALAC. This year, with the
somewhat unusual situation of four names being
provided by APRALO, without any real guidance to
the ALAC, we will have to carefully consider how
this should be done to ensure the ALAC makes a
wise decision. So it may take a bit longer to decide how we do this.
Alan
At 28/05/2017 03:02 PM, Judith Hellerstein wrote:
>HI Evan,
>
>I also thought this was weird but Dev Anand said
>this happened a couple of times in LACRALO. The
>recommended candidate was not chosen and another
>candidate was chosen. Also for APRALO, they are
>asking ALAC to make the selection from the 4
>referred candidates. When a question was asked
>as to why they were not having elections they
>stated that APRALO can choose to send all its
>candidates name to ALAC and for ALAC to make the
>choice. NOMCOM uses different rules than what
>we, in NARALO, currently use for elections and
>so the election for NOMCOM was just a preference and not a choice.
>
>Best,
>
>Judith
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
>Hellerstein & Associates
>3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
>Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
>Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
>E-mail:
><mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com>Judith at jhellerstein.com
>Website: <http://www.jhellerstein.com>www.jhellerstein.com
>Linked In:
><http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/>www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
>Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
>
>On 5/28/2017 2:54 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>>On 28 May 2017 at 14:34, Glenn McKnight
>><<mailto:mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>the NOMCOM goes through a secondary stage of
>>assessment from ALAC. Our NARALO
>>â â
>>vote resulted in the NARALO
>>majority recommending Leah Symekher to the
>>ALAC as the Delegate to the Nominating
>>Committee for the period of one year beginning
>>at the end of the ICANN60 Meeting in November
>>2017. Note that ALAC looks at both candidates
>>in coming up with their final decision .
>>
>>
>>âThere needs to be a compelling reason for
>>the ALAC to not endorse the elected
>>recommendation from a region. Such a rejection
>>is (and should be) rare, and I can't recall it ever happening.
>>
>>Not absolutely sure when ALAC makes their
>>decision. I will ask Alan Greenberg for
>>timelines. I assume it's at the next ALAC meeting.
>>
>>
>>âTypically, the ALAC holds a single vote to
>>endorse the recommended NomCom representatives
>>from all regions at once. It is usually done at
>>the first ALAC meeting held after all regional elections are done.â
>>
>>â- Evanâ
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>
>1;DM5PR03MB2714;27:kQMj0tRd1r+/Tb0D99HcKSKlSEoq5QIEgjNpfxUfQZrTw5f5BjCgfikwY3bhd2GQYEC5tbQ59HZ3ZS0uPq3BBvIEU3fR0OLQM18LTVyu36WIUBaSn4KlR9WV3vfosLZ3MHntOwvahhE8kWjyyfDG6g==
>X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
>
>ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000100)(400125000095)(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028)(400001001128)(400125100095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
>
>------
>NA-Discuss mailing list
>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss/attachments/20170528/b997f595/attachment.html>
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list