[NA-Discuss] Further on the Rules of Procedure

[Judith Hellerstein]

HI John,

As said yesterday.  It should be an alternate. In fact, At large is now 
requiring both a primary and a secondary alternative for each ALS.  In some 
cases they are even asking for two alternates. Please modify the document to 
include this

Best,

Judith

_________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com
Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide

On 3/29/2017 2:32 PM, John More wrote:
> Good point. The question is whether it should be a proxy or an alternative, or both.
>
> John More
>
>> On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Gordon Chillcott <gordontc at look.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed that 3.2 of the proposed ROP requires each ALS to select
>> one "voting representative".
>>
>> There does not seem to be any allowance for a designated proxy in cases
>> where the voting representative is temporarily unable to act for any
>> reason.
>>
>> In my own case, for example, I am not able to attend the upcoming
>> General Assembly and my ALS has designated another representative.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gordon Chillcott
>>
>>
>> ------
>> NA-Discuss mailing list
>> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>>
>> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>> ------
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>