[NA-Discuss] Regional Advice on .HEALTH Objection

Eric Brunner-Williams ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Thu Mar 7 03:03:51 UTC 2013


Now that most of the substantive issues are behind us, perhaps you
could explain this more fully:

> On 3/5/13 3:33 PM, Garth Bruen wrote:

> It is
> my opinion that this objection, if supported by At-Large, in fact represents
> a more serious threat to the public interest than deployment of the string
> itself. 

Would you be so kind as to explain yourself? Not your view on the
objections, but the view you've expressed -- that some affirmative act
by At-Large can have greater adverse consequences to the public than
the most debt-leveraged, highest ROI driven, for-profit exploit of
identifiers associated with human health is likely to create.


More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list