[NA-Discuss] Dotless domains

Evan Leibovitch evan at telly.org
Mon Jun 10 15:32:36 UTC 2013

Eric, I would agree that the Board already has good advice from the SSAC.
However, it appears that the Board, having received this advice, may not be
following it. There may be value in the ALAC being vocally supportive of
the SSAC work -- without re-inventing it -- and informing the Board that in
ALAC's view going against SSAC053 is against the public interest.

If the Board had fully heeded its AC's advice we would not be having this
discussion, and the Board would have trusted the SSAC advice rather than
needing third-party consultation and evaluation. At very least it would
have deferred the issue until the current round has been delegated (which
is what my original point was about).

On 10 June 2013 11:19, Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>wrote:

> Colleagues,
> I suggest that the first issue to consider is whether the Board is in
> possession of the best advice on the subject from some other AC, and
> if so, is further advice from another AC, ALAC in particular, can in
> fact inform the Board.
> In my view, the Board already has the best advice on the subject from
> an AC and no communication from another AC can in fact inform an
> already informed Board.
> Eric Brunner-Williams
> Eugene, Oregon
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------

Evan Leibovitch
Toronto Canada

Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list