[NA-Discuss] 2nd revision of NARALO Operating Procedures

Evan Leibovitch evan at telly.org
Thu Aug 8 18:12:47 UTC 2013

Doesn't the second sentence of #13 contradict #19?

In any case I still prefer the original form of #13; if you like add the
word "secret" before "vote" but I'm not sure what is broken in this
specific spot that needs fixing. That NARALO has used consensus more often
than other regions is IMO a feature, not a bug, and needless
synchronization with other regions for its own sake is not a worthwhile

I thought were were going for a minimal set of changes to accommodate
problems specifically raised by the current voting situation; anything
beyond that should be off the table right now.

On 8 August 2013 12:48, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Based on comments, I have made a few more changes. These are shown in BLUE.
> 12/13. Normal procedure in the ALAC is now to hold secret votes for
> elections/selections that are contended. The changes to 12 and 13 allow the
> NARALO to do this as well. This is in fact how we have been operating, so
> the change just ratifies our existing behavior.
> 16. Correct and error that said a suspended ALS could regain their active
> status by voting, but voting is the thing they are not allowed to do if
> inactive. Also added a provision whereby NARALO can request the the ALAC
> de-certify an essentially defunct ALS. The ALAC would still need to conduct
> due diligence, so the procedures in NARALO do not need to be exceedingly
> detailed.
> Last call for additional issues?
> Alan
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------

Evan Leibovitch
Toronto Canada

Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list