[NA-Discuss] Draft NARALO Operating Procedures

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Aug 8 14:40:46 UTC 2013

Evan, were there ever cases where there were more candidates than 
slots and consensus was used?  Alan

At 08/08/2013 04:34 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>On 6 August 2013 10:15, Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>At 06/08/2013 08:31 AM, Thompson, Darlene wrote:
>#12 refers to ALAC members being chosen by a rough consensus 
>process.  This has never been done.  It has always been done by a 
>voting process.  The rough consensus wording should rather be used 
>for routine decisions.
>I am happy to make such a change if there is such a will.
>I wouldn't say never.
>NARALO's first two non-ALAC reps -- Robert and Beau - were chosen by 
>consensus, no vote was ever taken. I believe that Gareth's selection 
>as well as my first, were also done that way.
>I would prefer to keep the option so to allow for the flexibility.
>- Evan

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list