[NA-Discuss] Article on Corruption of the Nomcom

[gbruen at knujon.com]

Yes, oath of secrecy sounds like "omerta"


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Morris <jam at jacquelinemorris.com>
Sender: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:02:55 
To: Glenn McKnight<mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>
Cc: <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Article on Corruption of the Nomcom

HI Glen
I'd like to suggest that instead of the "oath of secrecy" terminology, you
use the correct term for what NomCom members  sign, which is a
"confidentiality agreement". In my mind, there's a big difference, both in
actuality and in perception.
On Oct 18, 2012 9:13 AM, "Glenn McKnight" <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> I was asked my NARALO members to send a link to the recent article which
> critical of the NOMCOM
> For the record  I was part of the  NOMCOM  delegation which went to all the
> various  groups including a  Public NOMCOM  session to answer any questions
> on the failings of the NOMCOM
>
> Robert *Hall's  article  on the Corruption of the NOMCOM*
>  *http://a.sw.io/coMXJko*
> *
> *
> For the record.
> We met with the Board Goverance Committee and we detailed our distaste of
> this 'dirty laundry' yellow journalism and we emphasized the problematic
> position we were in due to the Oath of Secrecy
>
>
> --
> Glenn McKnight
> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
> Http://www.globalcatalysts.com
> http://newsocialmedia.wordpress.com
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------