[NA-Discuss] Geographic Regions Statement

Gareth Shearman shearman at victoria.tc.ca
Thu Jan 27 17:18:45 UTC 2011


This sounds about right to me.  

The Caribbean issues do need to be addressed in the process however.

Gareth


On 2011-01-27, at 8:32 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> On 27 January 2011 11:28, Thompson, Darlene <DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Evan,
>> 
>> That fully states my personal opinion, too.  We just have to put something
>> in, even if its "we don't care" or "we are fine with the status quo".  Staff
>> has nudged me and told me we have to put in SOMETHING.
>> 
>> So, unless anybody would like to issue some kind of a statement for the
>> region, our reply will be along the lines of "we are fine wtih the status
>> quo".
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How about something along the lines of "we are OK with the current situation
> in NA but encourage the work of other At-Large regions in which the current
> system may be seen to require change."
> 
> or somthing like that.
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> 
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
> 





More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list