[NA-Discuss] Geographic Regions Statement
Gareth Shearman
shearman at victoria.tc.ca
Thu Jan 27 17:18:45 UTC 2011
This sounds about right to me.
The Caribbean issues do need to be addressed in the process however.
Gareth
On 2011-01-27, at 8:32 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> On 27 January 2011 11:28, Thompson, Darlene <DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hi Evan,
>>
>> That fully states my personal opinion, too. We just have to put something
>> in, even if its "we don't care" or "we are fine with the status quo". Staff
>> has nudged me and told me we have to put in SOMETHING.
>>
>> So, unless anybody would like to issue some kind of a statement for the
>> region, our reply will be along the lines of "we are fine wtih the status
>> quo".
>>
>
>
>
>
> How about something along the lines of "we are OK with the current situation
> in NA but encourage the work of other At-Large regions in which the current
> system may be seen to require change."
>
> or somthing like that.
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list