[lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] [Ext] LACRALO Vote Processing

carlton.samuels at gmail.com carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Fri May 24 18:46:00 UTC 2024


[[-- Translated text (en -> es) --]]

Querido personal:
 Muy agradecido por esta información. Estoy seguro de que la "charla" está equivocada.

 Atentamente,
 carlton

 ===============================
 *Carlton A. Samuels*

 *Móvil: 876-818-1799Estrategia, proceso, gobernanza, evaluación y recuperación*
 ==============================


 El jueves 23 de mayo de 2024 a las 19:41, personal de At-Large de la ICANN<staff en atlarge.icann.org>
 escribió: 

> Dear Carlton,
>
>
>
> In accordance with LACRALO rules, (article 13) Staff prepares and
> publishes the names of each ALS and reps with its correspondent weighted
> vote. See the updated table for 2024 :
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=333971574
>
>
>
> The tool used for votes is Tally.  See 2023 results example :
> https://tally.icann.org/cgi/results?e=be9dd5eafc3
>
>
>
> Please note that this is the same voting system used in recent years.
>
>
>
> Rest assured the votes are weighted according to the rules.
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> At-Large Staff
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
> Website: atlarge.icann.org
> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge
> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>
> [image: signature_2565701208]
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *"Carlton com>" <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 3:57 PM
> *To: *At-Large Staff <staff en atlarge.icann.org>
> *Cc: *LAC-Discuss-en <lac-discuss-en en icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] LACRALO Vote Processing
>
>
>
> Dear Staff:
>
> There is a notion in circulation that the voting platform now used to
> record LACRALO votes cannot report which member received the [weighted]
> vote of an elector.
>
>
>
> We should err on the side of clarity.
>
>
>
> On principle, every member is entitled to audit not only their vote but
> all others cast.  Auditability itself remains an essential feature of the
> process so as to ensure mistakes are caught and properly addressed.
>
>
>
> In the recent past and when I was recipient of the credentials for the UWI
> ALS, the receipt from the voting event not only acknowledged the vote but
> the disposition of that vote.  The results reported always displayed the
> vote, weight of the vote and to whom the vote was accorded.
>
>
>
> Can you offer any clarity on the prevailing conditions?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> *Carlton A Samuels*
>
> *Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment &
> Turnaround*
> =============================
>


More information about the lac-discuss-es mailing list