<div dir="ltr">Gracias a todos po sus comentarios!<div><br></div><div>Hay dos vias para avanzar</div><div><br></div><div><ul><li>la inicial es añadirlo como comentario (revisado) a mi intervención en el microfono en San Juan, antes de la proxima llamada del WT5 que creo que es la semana entrante<br></li><li>la segunda es a traves de LACRALO (a mucha honra), dejandolo abierto a mas comentarios de los demas RALOs<br></li></ul><div>En todo caso voy a revisarlo en vista a los comentarios recibidos y vuelo a circularlo mañana. Definitivametne tenemos dos parametros importantes a cosdierar despues de la ultima ronda: el gran éxito de las ciudades grandes (por un principio de subsidiariadad de estar sujetos a las autoridades locales nada mas) y los malisimos resultados de comunidades que NO están basadas en geografía (.sport .gay). Creo que debemos ser cuidadososo, aprender de estas lecciones y hacer una definición muy detallada del proposito.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Que tenga un feliz día!</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez<br>ISOC Costa Rica Chapter<br>skype carlos.raulg<br>+506 8837 7176 <br>________<br>Apartado 1571-1000<br>COSTA RICA</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org" target="_blank">crg@isoc-cr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear Leadership of LACRALO,<div><br></div><div>As some of you know, I spent almost 3 years in a CWG ccNSO-GNSO on the use of country and territory names, and we got stuck on the 3 letter codes of the <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">ISO 3166-1 list.</font></span></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Last week, during the SubPro WT5 meeting in PR, we also got stuck on that very same list and I almost lost my hope of any progress. But after talks with members of the WT5, including the Swiss GAC rep, the ccTLD manag</font><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">ers of Estonia and New Zealand, and the </span>most able<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> ALAC Co-Chair of WT5, I came with some ideas on how to get rid of this stumbling block and continue making progress with a policy for full geo names for the future. </span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In that sense I kindly ask for your comments, additions, corrections and eventual support of the draft motion attached, that I want to add to my comments on the microphone during that session. Of course, I want to submit my comments before the next call which is next week.........</font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Glad to add the names of anyone who supports the motion</font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">DRAFT for comments and expression of support</font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> <span></span>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">Dear WT5 Participants:</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">We trust that all of us have returned home OK from San Juan following ICANN 61.</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">For the record and with a view to our next conference call on 28 March, 05.00 UTC, this is just to recall some points made during the discussion on Wednesday morning, 14 March.<br>
<br>For the Subsequent procedures PDP to go forward without delay, we need to make progress on a new geo.TLD policy for “full names” fast. Based on previous efforts (like the previous policy efforts of the ccNSO, the ccNSO-GNSO-CWG that followed, and the efforts within the GAC) it is not advisable to pursue the idea that the 2012 Applicant Guide Book (AGB) reserved list of geo.names (based on codes dependent on outside reference lists) a relevant default. That text (AGB) effectively failed to address several classes of names that are of significant interest to user communities, represents today a lacunae which gave rise to several disagreements and delays last time around (.amazon, .africa, .persiangulf). </p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">The first registered ccTLDs were <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.us" target="_blank"><span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-s1" style="color:rgb(228,175,10)">.us</span></a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.uk" target="_blank"><span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-s1" style="color:rgb(228,175,10)">.uk</span></a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.il" target="_blank"><span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-s1" style="color:rgb(228,175,10)">.il</span></a>, all registered in 1985. But It has taken until today to (not) make a decision on the 3 letter alpha codes. In the meantime, other geography-related top-level domains have been successfully delegated, like is the case for the city TLDs (.Berlin, .London, .Rio, etc.) as well as some region and new countries, like .cat, .bzh and .srb. Obviously, as more exception emerge to reference codes dependent on outside reference lists there is a growing space for conflict. There remains a tremendous and growing inconsistency in the particular case with the 3-letter codes of the ISO 3166-1 list which own the last round served as the basis for another ineffective reservation.<span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-Apple-converted-space"> </span>For that reason I have suggested during our meeting in ICANN61 that it is important for WT5 to eliminate the restrictions of the 3 letter ISO 3166-1 list is an important step, so that an effective<span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-Apple-converted-space"> </span>“<a href="http://full.geo.name" target="_blank">full.geo.name</a>” evaluation policy, consistent with modern developments in the DNS space can be developed for subsequent rounds.</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">Short codes/acronyms of the 3 letter ISO 3166-1 list are not “Generic” in the usual ICANN sense of the DNS expansion but for few exceptions. For that reason, I submit this modest draft <span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-s2" style="text-decoration:underline">PROPOSAL TO DELEGATE 3 letter codes to interested Governments and other geo related public interest entities previous or during the next round. </span>Taking the delegation of 2-letter codes to ccTLD managers as a precedent n the mid-80s, we should assume that there is demand out there for the differentiated use of 3 letter ISO 3166-1 list codes, either by Governments, public entities, communities and even some ccTLD managers themselves. So instead of the 3-letter codes of the ISO-<span style="color:rgb(69,69,69);font-family:"Helvetica Neue";font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">3166-1</span> list remaining reserved, the WT5 should analyze the possibility of using subsequent rounds and use the proven evaluation methodology and assigning process of the last round (like in the case for city names) for the ISO list 3 letter codes.</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">This option to delegate/register the whole<span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-Apple-converted-space"> </span>3-letter code ISO list, opens the space for other public interest parties to apply for a few IGO/IGNO specific 3 letter codes that also have been reserved (IOC, WHO, IMF) and then leaving all other 3 letter permutation outside the ISO list and IGO/INGOs open for creative applications in the generic domain space. A back of the envelope calculation will show that offering to delegate the first group and taking into account the existing 3 letter codes will amount to a total of less than 500 TLDs. That leaves more than 20’000 possible permutation open for evaluation as new gTLDs.</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">WT5 should seriously consider a delegation process for the 3 letter ISO 3166-1 list (as opposed to maintaining an incongruent reservation list) under the following assignment conditions</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p1" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69);min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">1. Right of First Refusal To Governments of countries/territories to THEIR 3 Letter Codes (ISO...);<span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-Apple-converted-space"> </span></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">2. Right of Second Refusal al ccTLD manager del país o territorio correspondiente (en PR sería Gauss/PR Top Level Domain, no el Estado Libre Asociado);<span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-Apple-converted-space"> </span></p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">3. Right of the Third Refusal to a pertinent linguistic, ethnic, indigenous community or people as said concepts are defined by International Law; as long as they get support from the respective political entities</p>
<p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">4. If none of the above show interest in the pertinent 3 Letter Code of the ISO 3166-1,<span class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-Apple-converted-space"> </span>then to any IGO/INGO that has requested protection in the past</p><p class="m_6761058011640636205gmail-p2" style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";color:rgb(69,69,69)">5. Finally, if then string shall be an available gTLD for any qualified applicant.</p>
<br></font></div><div><div><br></div><div><br clear="all"><div><div class="m_6761058011640636205gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez<br>ISOC Costa Rica Chapter / ALS Costa Rica<br>skype carlos.raulg<br><a href="tel:+506%208837%207176" value="+50688377176" target="_blank">+506 8837 7176</a> <br>________<br>Apartado 1571-1000<br>COSTA RICA</div></div></div></div>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>