[lac-discuss-es] ?????? = UTF-8 q Cerraerdo_comentario_p = C3 = BAblico_24-M = q = utf-8-17_de AR =?

myaguero en msn.com myaguero en msn.com
Vie Mar 24 17:38:58 UTC 2017 

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: ?????? = UTF-8 q Cerraerdo_comentario_p = C3 = BAblico_24-M = q = utf-8-17_de AR =? 
 De: myaguero en msn.com

 Gracias Alberto. Muy importante tu Correo. 


 Saludos 


 Maritza 


 Enviado desde mi iPhone 


> El 24 mar. 2017, a las 11:48, "aidanoblia en gmail.com" <aidanoblia en gmail.com> escribi贸:
> 
> 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
> 
> Subject: Re:?????? = Utf-8 q Cerraerdo_comentario_p = C3 = BAblico_24-M = q = utf-8-17_de AR =? 
> Desde: aidanoblia en gmail.com
> 
> Thanks Alberto. Indeed, if there was doubt I sent my mail. I think it is 
> good to see that there are many people involved and supports, as you mention. 
> 
> 
> regards 
> 
> 
> On 24 March 2017, 13:09, Alberto Soto <asoto en ibero-americano.org>
> wrote: 
> 
> 
>> Bien estimados, envi茅 el mail, y se recibe una respuesta que debe ser
>> confirmada. All铆 se aclara que la opini贸n enviada se colocar谩 en el sitio
>> web, sin restricci贸n de acceso.
>> 
>> Sugiero que quienes a煤n no hayan participado, lo hagan antes de las 2300
>> UTC
>> de hoy a traves de un mail a
>> comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 en icann.org
>> Una forma es decir que apoya la opini贸n vertida en el informe de LACRALO,
>> y/o que apoyan lo vertido en la respuesta de ALAC, o ambas cosas en el
>> mismo
>> mail.
>> Es muy importante vuestra colaboraci贸n.
>> 
>> Saludos cordiales
>> 
>> Alberto Soto
>> 
>> -----Mensaje original-----an
>> De: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de
>> Alberto
>> Soto
>> Enviado el: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:08 AM
>> Para: lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Cerraerdo comentario p煤blico 24-MAR-17 de
>> 
>> Dear Olivier, gracias nuevamente. LACRALO tuvo problemas para dejar su
>> comentario en estos formularios, y al parecer hubo varios con el mismo
>> problema. Imagino que Harold termin贸 envi谩ndolo por correo. Yo tambi茅n
>> estoy
>> utilizando esa v铆a.
>> Me llama la atenci贸n que en un tema como este, se utilice este proceso:
>> formulario fijo (con problemas) y correo.
>> Y el p煤blico que comenta no tiene acceso al resto de los comentarios, ni
>> los
>> realizados en el formulario o los enviados por correo Es muy raro....
>> 
>> Saludos cordiales
>> 
>> Alberto Soto
>> 
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de
>> ocl en gih.com Enviado el: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 AM
>> Para: lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Asunto: Re: Cerrado comentario p煤blico 24-MAR-17 de
>> 
>> 
>> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>> 
>> Asunto: Re: Cerrado comentario p煤blico 24-MAR-17 de
>> De: ocl en gih.com
>> 
>> Querido Alberto,
>> 
>> 
>> ALS y At-Large se alent贸 a los miembros a responder directamente a la
>> consulta por correo electr贸nico a:
>> comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 en icann.org
>> 
>> 
>> La fecha l铆mite para comentarios directos el 24 de marzo 2017 23:59 GMT
>> 
>> 
>> Pero el ALAC y las RALO l铆deres han obtenido tambi茅n prepar贸 comentarios
>> de las discusiones de consenso. Los borradores de estos comentarios han
>> sido
>> Ya circulado. El comentario RALO ha tomado directamente de entrada de todo
>> RALOS particular a los trabajos del grupo de trabajo de LACRALO y se puede
>> encontrar aqu铆:
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5
>> Ch
>> OPA/edit?usp=sharing
>> 
>> 
>> La Declaraci贸n de ALAC se elabor贸 \u200b\u200bcon varias solicitudes de
>> entrada de la  comunidad y su 煤ltimo borrador se adjunta.
>> 
>> 
>> Entiendo que ahora ambos estados est谩n congelados - es decir finalizados,
>> excepto si alguien se帽ala un error de hecho.
>> 
>> 
>> ALS se les anima a apoyar la ALAC y las declaraciones de RALO, pero
>> Tambi茅n se les anima a comentar directamente al email anterior, utilizando
>> o no
>> usando la plantilla.
>> 
>> 
>> Saludos cordiales,
>> 
>> 
>> Olivier
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> En 23/03/2017 02:09, asoto en ibero-americano.org escribi贸:
>>> Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the
>>> comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the
>> company.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p
>>> then containing the recommendations is sixteen.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power
>>> review the first draft.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on
>>> that draft, which served to comment on the document
>>> contains recommendations is sixteen.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is
>>> They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your
>>> OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually
>>> Be prepared to personal comments on both documents.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav
>> s
>> 
>>> form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a
>>> format for review comment for comment.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains
>>> several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated
>>> in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n
>>> on it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a
>>> form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document
>>> He gave rise to that form.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way
>>> making a general comment, not particularly about each
>>> RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our
>>> freedom of opinion.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The link in question:
>>> &lt;
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-
>> review-draft-report-pub
>>> lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf&gt;
>>> 
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-
>> review-draft-report-publ
>> 
>>> ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Olivier MJ Cr pin-Leblond, PhD
>> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/304eda3f1b.html
--]]

M醩 informaci髇 sobre la lista de distribuci髇 lac-discuss-es