Cerrado comentario público 24-MAR-17 de

[ocl en gih.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Cerrado comentario público 24-MAR-17 de 
 De: ocl en gih.com

 Querido Alberto, 


 ALS y At-Large se alentó a los miembros a responder directamente a la 
 consulta por correo electrónico a: 
 comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 en icann.org 


 La fecha límite para comentarios directos el 24 de marzo 2017 23:59 GMT 


 Pero el ALAC y las RALO líderes han obtenido también preparó comentarios 
 de las discusiones de consenso. Los borradores de estos comentarios han sido 
 Ya circulado. El comentario RALO ha tomado directamente de entrada de todo 
 RALOS particular a los trabajos del grupo de trabajo de LACRALO y se puede encontrar aquí: 
 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5ChOPA/edit?usp=sharing 


 La Declaración de ALAC se elaboró \u200b\u200bcon varias solicitudes de entrada de la 
 comunidad y su último borrador se adjunta. 


 Entiendo que ahora ambos estados están congelados - es decir finalizados, 
 excepto si alguien señala un error de hecho.


 ALS se les anima a apoyar la ALAC y las declaraciones de RALO, pero 
 También se les anima a comentar directamente al email anterior, utilizando o no 
 usando la plantilla. 


 Saludos cordiales, 


 Olivier 




 En 23/03/2017 02:09, asoto en ibero-americano.org escribió: 
> Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the 
>  comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the company. 
>
>
>  There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p 
>  then containing the recommendations is sixteen. 
>
>
>  The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power 
>  review the first draft. 
>
>
>  Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on 
>  that draft, which served to comment on the document 
>  contains recommendations is sixteen. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is 
>  They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your 
>  OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually 
>  Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s 
>  form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a 
>  format for review comment for comment. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains 
>  several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated 
>  in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n 
>  on it. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a 
>  form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document 
>  He gave rise to that form. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way 
>  making a general comment, not particularly about each 
>  RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our 
>  freedom of opinion. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  The link in question: 
>  <  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub 
>  lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> 
>  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ 
>  ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


 Olivier MJ Cr pin-Leblond, PhD 
 http://www.gih.com/ocl.html 





[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1b87922f27.html
--]]