[lac-discuss-es] IO recomienda .amazon reconsideration

rihogris en gmail.com rihogris en gmail.com
Sab Jul 22 00:42:09 UTC 2017


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: IO recomienda .amazon reconsideration 
 De: rihogris en gmail.com

 Evan, 
 Claro, es bloquear la mente cuando no todos los participantes están incluidos, y 
 También estoy enterado, usted está trayendo en esta solución como fuera de la caja una, 
 Como dice Alejandro. 


 Por otra parte, podría funcionar, con gran esfuerzo de la sociedad civil, 
 (Ya que hay grandes diferencias culturales entre todos nuestros países), pero 
 Entonces, la situación política real de los países es la peor en el 
 Último ... (Realmente no sé cuándo estos nueve países tienen un buen 
 Relación desde el descubrimiento de Colón!). ¿Estarán todos de acuerdo en crear una 
 (Preferible un multi-interesado uno) para manejar este .amazonas? 


 Realmente no sé cómo resolver el problema de .amazon, y entiendo de 
 Las soluciones de caja, seguramente encajará. 


 mejor 


 Ricardo Holmquist 


 2017-07-21 19:16 GMT-05: 00 Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch en gmail.com> :
 
 
> I think we're getting caught up on the details, not the general concept. I
> apologize for not being sufficiently inclusive, but do not wish that error
> to obscure the broader point.
>
> If the original email had said nine countries instead of five, how would
> your response have changed? What are the substantive objections?
>
> (And please note that I'm not advancing this as a perfect answer... just
> suggesting it as a middle ground that both sides find somewhat sub-optimal,
> but less painful than ongoing  expensive battles.)
>
> -Evan
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 17:19, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris en gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I do not share the solution given, but further than that, it contains
>> geographical mistakes, my country is not being included in the list of the
>> five countries, because this person is supposing it only has to do with the
>> river, and for us is also the forest, where we have about 25% of our
>> territory. The State where the Amazon jungle is located is called Amazonas,
>> and is not being included in the 3 countries with territories called
>> Amazonas.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Ricardo Holmquist
>> ISOC Venezuela
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Libre
>> de virus. www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>> <#m_6266614077816008559_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> 2017-07-21 15:28 GMT-05:00 Evan Leibovitch <evan en telly.org>:
>>
>>> I read on a Facebook group, from Barry Shein, an imaginative and IMO
>>> effective resolution to the .amazon issue. I offer it here with some
>>> personal suggestions added regarding to 'what comes next':
>>>
>>> Amazon pays for the creation of the ".amazonas" TLD, and entrusts it to
>>> a nonprofit whose stakeholders are exclusively from the five countries  (Brazil,
>>> Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia) through which the river runs. Such
>>> stakeholders could be government, NGO or private. In return, the GAC
>>> rescinds its objection to .amazon.
>>>
>>> (Alternatively, dot-amazonas could be entrusted to the three regional
>>> governments -- in Peru, Colombia and Brazil -- that are named "Amazonas".)
>>>
>>> After all, "Amazonas" is the local name for the river in both Spanish
>>> and Portuguese. Since elsewhere governments are turning to local names
>>> rather than anglicized ones -- think Beijing, Iqaluit or Bengaluru --
>>> wouldn't this be a Good Thing and a reasonable answer to both the
>>> governments and the bookstore?
>>>
>>> Such an offer would dull most of the logical objection to the
>>> bookstore's desire for the name, while calling on the affected countries to
>>> actually indicate what they would do with an appropriate TLD, or at least
>>> to reserve it for future use.
>>>
>>> Would such a compromise be workable? Or would it cause a problem by
>>> putting the current objectors on the spot regarding what they would do with
>>> the TLD themselves?
>>>
>>> (Perhaps this re-opens a wider problem with geoTLD names, wondering if
>>> every possible linguistic name for countries and regions are deserving of
>>> protection. I mean, do we need to protect "Schweiz", "Suisse", "Svizzera",
>>> "Svizra", "Helvetia" AND "Switzerland"?)
>>>
>>> - Evan
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>>
>>>
>>
   


[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0b7a135475.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es