[lac-discuss-es] IO recomienda .amazon reconsideration

[rihogris en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: IO recomienda .amazon reconsideration 
 De: rihogris en gmail.com

 Hola, 
 No comparto la solución dada, pero además, contiene 
 Errores geográficos, mi país no está incluido en la lista de los 
 Cinco países, porque esta persona está suponiendo que sólo tiene que ver 
 Río, y para nosotros es también el bosque, donde tenemos cerca del 25% de nuestra 
 territorio. El Estado donde se encuentra la selva amazónica se llama Amazonas, 
 Y no está siendo incluido en los 3 países con territorios llamados 
 Amazonas. 


 Mejor 


 Ricardo Holmquist 
 ISOC Venezuela 


 <  https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> 
 Libre 
 El virus Www.avast.com 
 <  https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> 
 <# DAB4FAD8 - 2DD7 - 40BB - A1B8 - 4E2AA1F9FDF2> 


 2017-07-21 15:28 GMT-05: 00 Evan Leibovitch <evan en telly.org> : 


> I read on a Facebook group, from Barry Shein, an imaginative and IMO
> effective resolution to the .amazon issue. I offer it here with some
> personal suggestions added regarding to 'what comes next':
>
> Amazon pays for the creation of the ".amazonas" TLD, and entrusts it to a
> nonprofit whose stakeholders are exclusively from the five countries (Brazil,
> Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia) through which the river runs. Such
> stakeholders could be government, NGO or private. In return, the GAC
> rescinds its objection to .amazon.
>
> (Alternatively, dot-amazonas could be entrusted to the three regional
> governments -- in Peru, Colombia and Brazil -- that are named "Amazonas".)
>
> After all, "Amazonas" is the local name for the river in both Spanish and
> Portuguese. Since elsewhere governments are turning to local names rather
> than anglicized ones -- think Beijing, Iqaluit or Bengaluru -- wouldn't
> this be a Good Thing and a reasonable answer to both the governments and
> the bookstore?
>
> Such an offer would dull most of the logical objection to the bookstore's
> desire for the name, while calling on the affected countries to actually
> indicate what they would do with an appropriate TLD, or at least to reserve
> it for future use.
>
> Would such a compromise be workable? Or would it cause a problem by
> putting the current objectors on the spot regarding what they would do with
> the TLD themselves?
>
> (Perhaps this re-opens a wider problem with geoTLD names, wondering if
> every possible linguistic name for countries and regions are deserving of
> protection. I mean, do we need to protect "Schweiz", "Suisse", "Svizzera",
> "Svizra", "Helvetia" AND "Switzerland"?)
>
> - Evan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/560869f381.html
--]]