[lac-discuss-es] Asunto

Dom Jun 12 21:28:39 UTC 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Los procedimientos de nombramiento dentro de OE / ACS: Asunto 
 De: crg en isoc-cr.org

 Estimado Vanda, 

 gracias por recordarnos de este tema tan importante. 

 No quiero anticiparme una discusión en la lista de LACRALO, pero me dejó 
 informarle que en la actualidad tenemos a los asuntos pendientes de revisión cuidadosa 
 del procedimiento en el Consejo de la GNSO que exigen gran atención y 
 una cuidadosa consideración de las cuestiones presidente del ALAC ha planteado en su 
 Nota. La primera fue la elección indefinida del Presidente de los Consejos 
 Dublín, y más reciente, la selección del enlace GNSO-GAC. Mientras en 
 tanto en caso de que tuvo un claro conjunto de reglas y procedimientos formales, en tanto 
 casos en que las reglas no es suficiente para resolver las incertidumbres eventuales.

 Mirando hacia el futuro, en mi opinión esta la de las cuestiones tendrán que ser registrados 
 a los efectos de los ACCT WS2 sub-equipos en SO / responsabilidad de CA, si 
 sólo para ganar de experiencias similares, evitar la duplicación de trabajo y 
 alcanzando un nivel común de transparencia en las citas a través de la 
 comunidad. 

 Aclamaciones 

 Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez 
 +506 8837 7176 
 Skype: carlos.raulg 
 desplazamiento UTC actual: -6.00 (Costa Rica) 
 El 12 jun 2016, a las 15:15, vanda en scartezini.org escribió: 

> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>
>  Asunto: Re: Candidato ALAC ComitÃ© de SelecciÃ³n
>  De: vanda en scartezini.org
>
>  Queridos miembros
>
>
>  Creo que este es un problemas adicional Los ALAC donde estÃ¡ tratando 
> de heverton opiniones mÃ¡s amplias que en sÃ ALAC. Por favor, 
> siÃ©ntase libre de expresar su opiniÃ³n.
>  Atentamente
>
>
>  Vanda
>  Enviado desde mi iPad
>  Lo siento por errores tipogrÃ¡ficos y faltas de ortografÃa
>
>
>> On 12 de jun de 2016, at 13:45, Alan Greenberg 
>> <alan.greenberg en mcgill.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Several months ago, we talked about forming (or perhaps reforming 
>> since there was one when Olivier was Chair) a candidate selection 
>> committee to make recommendations to the ALAC on the appointment of 
>> people to various positions.
>>
>> There are generally two kinds of positions that we consider:
>>
>> 1. Positions appointed to (or recommended for appointment to, when 
>> the ALAC does not have the final say) various groups within ICANN. 
>> Examples include Cross-Community Working Groups (under the current 
>> rules used for the CWG-Stewardship and the CCWG-Accountability, and 
>> in the Draft CCWG Framework under consideration), Affirmation of 
>> Commitments Reviews (a name that probably will change under the 
>> pending Bylaw changes) and  the CSC overseeing the new IANA. In these 
>> cases, the appointee has a responsibility to work with the ALAC and 
>> At-Large, but does not normally formally represent them (thus we have 
>> found that the appointed members of the CCWG-Accountability have at 
>> times had different positions on some issues).
>>
>> 2. Positions where the person is a Liaison to other bodies, generally 
>> within ICANN, and formally represents the ALAC in those groups. 
>> Moreover, in some cases, there are specific requirements that must be 
>> met.
>>
>> In the past, we have not used a selection committee for this second 
>> type of appointment, but the importance of them is such that I think 
>> that we should have formal discussions on the candidates before an 
>> ALAC vote. Moreover, our Rules of Procedure allow the ALAC to 
>> re-appoint Liaisons without opening nominations, a practice that some 
>> people have felt is not appropriate. A selection committee would be 
>> an ideal place to hold the discussion on whether to do so in any 
>> given case.
>>
>> The issue has been discussed within the ALT, and the general feeling 
>> is that in the case of the first class of appointments, there should 
>> be a committee similar to that used when Olivier was Chair. 
>> Specifically, a group composed of ten people, led by the ALAC Chair, 
>> with five of its members selected by RALOs (according to their own 
>> rules ands standards) and five selected by the ALAC, one per region 
>> in each case. Such an ALAC committee is in accordance with RoP 
>> Section 18.3.
>>
>> Most (or perhaps all) ALT members feel that using the ALT itself as 
>> the ALAC Members on the selection committee makes sense (perhaps 
>> augmented by one additional person from the Chair's region). The ALT 
>> is selected annually to represent the interests of the regions on the 
>> leadership team, already works well together and is geared up for 
>> quick responses. But that is open for discussion.
>>
>> For appointments of Liaisons and any other positions that formally 
>> represent the ALAC, there is a strong (but not unanimous) belief in 
>> the ALT that such recommendations must be made by ALAC members. 
>> Ultimately, people recommended by this group must represent the ALAC 
>> and it is ALAC members that must pass judgement. Again, I think the 
>> ALT is an easy choice for but other alternatives are possible. I 
>> would have no problem with the RALO appointees also participating in 
>> the discussions, since they would already understand the 
>> confidentiality issues related to personnel selection.
>>
>> Note that in all cases, the selection committee has the option of 
>> providing one or more candidates for the consideration of the ALAC, 
>> but with the assurance that all candidates presented to the ALAC meet 
>> at the very least the minimum requirements.
>>
>> I would appreciate comments so we can refine this quickly and approve 
>> it in Helsinki. ALT Members who have varying opinions are of course 
>> welcome to clearly state their positions.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: 
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
>

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/955d914d22.html
--]]