Proyección y Participación SC
asoto en ibero-americano.org
asoto en ibero-americano.org
Mar Feb 16 05:36:24 UTC 2016
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Proyección y Participación SC
De: asoto en ibero-americano.org
Estimado Alan, en la reunión de hoy de LACRALO, Dev wuld llama a una reunión para
clarificación.
Yo ya había definido no tomar ninguna acción hasta que tengamos una respuesta sobre este
importar.
Esto fue necesario el 11 de enero de este año.
Es muy importante para LACRALO todo se haya realizado de acuerdo con las reglas.
Saludos cordiales
Alberto Soto
----- Mensaje original -----
De: lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan
Greenberg
Enviado EL: jueves, 14 de enero de 2016 03:13
Para: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Proyección y Participación SC
Estimado Alberto,
Este mensaje fue presentada directamente en mi carpeta de ALC-Comenta y yo no lo sabía
de la misma hasta que el personal me habló de él.
Voy a investigar y en contacto con usted tan pronto como sea posible.
Alan
A 01/11/2016 07:17 AM, asoto en ibero-americano.org escribió:
> [[- Texto traducido (es -> es) -]]
>
> Subject: Re: Outreach and Engagement SC
> From: asoto en ibero-americano.org
>
> Dear Alan, I am forced as President of LACRALO to get in Contact
> this topic.
> The insistence of the president of a Subcomitde ALAC (Scope and
> commitment
> SC) to make decisions that by law must be taken within LACRALO and
> ALS participation of its members, forcing me to it.
> Repeated explanations do not justify that decision.
> It has been cited comments of Alexander Pisanty YMOS as if they had
> been Plan approval generated in that consultation subcomitsin
> previously the document that already contbamos. Both the opinion of
> Alejandro as ma, were criticisms of such a document. A posteriori
> despite the wrong procedure, as a sign of goodwill and seeking peace
> in our region, gave the plan as accepted, despite our tena more
> specific details on the passes, according to the list I promptly
> present, and long before this Strategic Plan.The main detail was that
> must be taken into account as a priority, those countries that have
> the lower index of penetration of Internet, as a way to begin which
> requeran greater support and coordinate further action with GSE
> ICANN.
> Pedaclaraciones the President of Subcomiten our last meeting
> monthly; allno only insistien his mistake, but the confirmque
> Subcomitse part of that people will take over the implementacin of
> the plan, and in addition they were analyzed alternative program
> CROPP for its implementation by that Subcommittee. As synthesis of
> this particular issue: first an ALS presents a project is approved
> LACRALO consensus on leadership and then sends it to LACRALO CROPP
> approval to GSE program and beyond. Estn is spewing one attribution
> does not correspond, despite being pidipor mail and the last monthly
> meeting that they did not.
> Insistien also said subcomitestaba formed by members LACRALO,
> understanding that it mistakenly convalidaba such actions.
> The LACRALO has signed MOU with ICANN, giving us independence in
> decisions, to be taken within the scope of our region and in our
> regulatory scope of discussion, and not within a Subcomitde ALAC,
> although estintegrado by members of LACRALO.
> In the links who are listed in the mail below, you can see that the
> AFRALO similar program was approved by the members of AFRALO 21
> September 2015; the APRALO by their leaders on July 3, 2015; he
> NARALO by Glenn McKnight 4l August 4, 2015; Dev the EURALO Anand
> Teelucksingh the 29 th September 2015; and also by LACRALO Dev Anand
> Teelucksingh 15 September 2015. At least for LACRALO is He has taken
> an attribution that does not belong.
> In the mail cited by the Chairman of the subcommittee, there are
> inconsistencies such as mail exchange for the proposed Carlton
> Samuels to go to Suriname; this one was presented by Dev Anand in
> Teelucksingh we held a meeting on the issue of Haity Dominica
> Republic.Was with such urgency that we had no time to present it to
> LACRALO and we define exceptionally Humberto in that meeting to not
> miss a CROPP trip. In the previous meeting at the last ICANN meeting
> in Buenos Aires, cited we agree and published the names of those
> travel to that meeting. The President of CROPP, Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> I publicdichos names, but the list omitien his own, since viajcon a
> vacancy of the program.
> By safeguarding our decisions, our region, and waiting avoid future
> problems, you have to apply well to the directive for that
> Subcommittee.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Alberto Soto
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of
> devtee en gmail.com Posted on: Sunday, January 10, 2016 20:36
> To: lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Outreach and Engagement SC
>
>
>
>
> [[Translated text (en -> en) -]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: Outreach and Engagement SC
> From: devtee en gmail.com
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
>
> Just to clarify repeatedly:
>
>
>
>
> - The call for people to join the commitment divulgaciny SC (O SC
> & E
> - https://community.icann.org/x/cqfbAQ)
>
>
>
>(Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-July/0128
>71.ht
> ml)
> and several people in LACRALO answered the call. The LACRALO Scope
> SC confirmed the commitment and ideas to the strategy, continuation,
> This strategy published for comment a list of LACRALO
>
>(Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September
>/0134
> 80.html).
>
>
>
>
> The Nicaraguan comments received were LACRALO list
> - Alejandro Pisanty -
>
>
>
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September/
>01351
> 3.html
> - Alberto Soto -
>
>
>
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September/
>01351
> 5.html
>
>
>
>
> I will answer those comments
> -
>
>Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September/
>01355
> 9.html
> -
>
>Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-September/
>01356
> 0.html
>
>
>
>
> and the strategy updated based on comments received. By not have no
> more comments, the strategy was presented in
>
>https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Outreach+Strategi
>c+Pla
> n
> and members of ALC in divulgaciny commitment trying estn SC
> to meet that strategy.
>
>
>
>
> One of the activities of the SC O & E is a calendar of events
> Possible track events at the regional level - the Outreach events
> calendar LAC ARE http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar
> If you are aware of the possible events that could be possible in
> disclosure events, please suggest that Bartlett Morgan
> bartlett.morgan en gmail.com or what JosArce josefranciscoarce en gmail.com
> This calendar can be updated.
>
>
>
>
> Anyone in LACRALO ALS any representative who cares by the objectives
> of Outreach and Engagement SC are more than welcome to join the
> Outreach and Engagement SC sending an e-mail staff en atlarge.icann.org
> calls O & E have interpretation espaola given the presence of
> several people called estn LACRALO.Las open for anyone in At-Large to
> attend.
>
>
>
>
> Outreach and Engagement SC wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/x/cqfbAQ
> Outreach and Engagement SC meetings:
> https://community.icann.org/x/2Ig3Ag
> transcripts of meetings.
> Outreach and Engagement SC Monthly reports:
>
>
>
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Subcommittee+on+Outrea
>ch+an
> Engagement d + + + Monthly Reports
>
>
>
>
> It is unfortunate that people not following the estn LACRALO At-Large
> Working Group activities and therefore do not understand the
> Activities Working Group. Given that At-Large Working Groups are
> opportunities to join At-Large, I strongly suggest that At-Large
> activities of the Working Group is an agenda item of series LACRALO
> monthly calls in a similar manner to the Upgrading of policies.
>
>
>
>
> Finally, I only to point out regarding Cropp applications, as
> representative CROPP Review Team and as a member of the then Scope
> SC, have worked with the Secretariat and chair THIN (Alberto Soto and
> Humberto Carrasco) and other representatives of LACRALO from the start
> CROPP. For instance:
>
>
>
>
> - The conference call with Alberto, Sylvia, Humberto, Len, Fátima,
> and Juan Rojas (like representative LACRALO CROPP) on April 9, 2014 re:
> Ideas for the trip Alberto Soto and Sylvia to go Republic Dominican
> Republic and Haiti https://community.icann.org/x/bDbRAg
> - The numerous electronic mails between Alberto Soto, Humberto Sylvia
> travel to the Dominican Republic and Haita from the vague ideas in a
> practical proposal that may be made under the Cropp guidelines (using
> 4 slots 5 trips)
> - The email messages with Alberto and Humberto to confirm CROPP
> other Carlton Samuels proposal to go to Suriname (using the fifth
> trip space).
> - The numerous electronic mails between the proposal and Alberto Soto
> Alfonso Acosta Diego Bastidas to go to Cuba to make the idea of
> \u200b\u200ba stumble on a practice that cumplicon CROPP guidelines.
> - LACRALO notified of the possibility of using the proposals to Cropp
> attend meetings of ICANN F2F ICANN53 in Buenos Aires, Argentina
>
>
>
>(Http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/2015-May/01238
>2.htm
> l)
> in which several people from LACRALO apply.
> - Have a call with Alberto Soto and Humberto Carrasco (
> https://community.icann.org/x/lok0Aw)
> LACRALO applications for Alberto Soto and Humberto Carrasco choose
> Cropp proposals (which was to be sent Sergio Salinas Porto, Jos
> Salgueiro and Carlton Samuels) to the RT CROPP for travelers to
> ICANN53 attend.
>
>
>
>
> In all these cases, the chair of LACRALO and the Secretariat were see
> before the applications were submitted to the ICANN CROPP RT and
> despusa GSE for their approvals. This has not changed.
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
> Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> LAC co scope and commitment SC
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The sea, December 22, 2015 at 4:05 pm, <asoto en ibero-americano.org>
>wrote:
> >
> > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
> >
> > Subject: Outreach and Engagement SC
> > From: asoto en ibero-americano.org
> >
> > In the last monthly meeting the Chair of the Outreach and
> > Engagement SC, Anand Teelucksingh, explained the workings of such
> > subcomity Plan Strategic LACRALO.
> >
> >
> > Before that, one of our ALAC Members consultporque me recibiuna
> > task of Dev: take care of a particular country to try capture an
> > organization for subsequent certification as ALS. Le
> >
> >
> > It is the second time I make this comment. Tenamos generated and
> > tested a Similar plan, but added an order of countries, based on
> > the index of Internet penetration. That is, work with an inclusive
> > character, start Indexes with more low passes and I aslo did.
> >
> >
> > With this Plan incorporla current ALS Haiti, the country with the
> > lowest index in our region. And also ISOC Dominican Republic.
> >
> >
> > The Strategic Plan of LACRALO generated by the Outreach and
> > Engagement siguiel not normally trmite of any plan to be approved
> > by consensus. And this does not mean that it is correct, but the
> > procedure It is incorrect.
> >
> >
> > In addition: The goal of the ALAC Subcomisin on extension and
> > commitment It is developing both a strategy for At-Large to reach
> > new members Potential community outreach, involve members ascomo
> > new and existing. Once this strategy is developed, it will working
> > with its members, the ALAC and RALO to ensure the strategy
> > successfully implemented.
> >
> >
> > Estdesarrollada strategy, but it has not fulfilled the last paragraph:
> > work with our RALO.
> >
> >
> > The same subcomitestrealizando the implementacin, which is not
> > applicable, it must do our region.
> >
> >
> > At some point you asignarviajes by continuing with this program
> > CROPP implementacin. This procedure is incorrect, it is to be
> > treated within our region.ALS first, then approved by LACRALO, then
> > CROPP the Commission of the GSE program and then.
> >
> >
> > The fact that several members of LACRALO subcomittenga; and either
> > You can enroll at any time, it does not provide authority for the
> > implementacin execution of the program, which must be made within
> > LACRALO.
> >
> >
> > I ask Dev to make the appropriate changes, and start working in
> > coordination with the leadership of LACRALO.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Alberto Soto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner)
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> >
> > This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/851b1d3db0.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es