FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión

aidanoblia en gmail.com aidanoblia en gmail.com
Vie Nov 27 12:56:11 UTC 2015


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión 
 De: aidanoblia en gmail.com

 Comparto las dos Propuestas de Vanda en Cuanto una cola el Experto 
 Independiente Dębe Tener un Conocimiento De Las Vivencias En Los Diferentes 
 Países y no solo teórico Conocimiento ONU. Sin el contexto conocer 
 interno y la idiosincracia de las Personas En Cada País le Será muy Difícil 
 Tener idea clara del SIGNIFICADO verdadero de Ciertos Hechos, Acciones e 
 Palabras INCLUIDO, ya Que El lenguaje Mismo Tiene A Veces Expresiones o 
 Palabras que pueden no Ser comprendidas en su contexto. 
 También comparto lo DICHO RESPECTO una cola es Necesaria la Experiencia en 
 ICANN, Que Es Un Organismo Bastante Complejo y Requiere Tiempo y dedicación 
 conocerlo párr. 


 Me preocupa la PREGUNTA de Carlos, no se me ocurre Respuesta y me parece 
 Una PREGUNTA Esencial.


 El Hecho De Que los Expertos reunan las Condiciones adecuadas párr su carga 
 va a depender de lo Que se establezca Como Requisitos Necesarios párrafo Do 
 nombramiento por y también de los Criterios y Métodos de DESIGNACION Que Tengan 
 Las Personas Que designan lo. 




 Saludos a todos. 






 11.25.2015 20:03 GMT-03: 00 Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez <crg en isoc-cr.org> : 


> Gracias Vanda,
>
> es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustaría saber QUIEN escoge
> al experto.
>
>
> Saludos cordiales
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
> skype carlos.raulg
> +506 8837 7176  (New  Phone number!!!!)
> ________
> Apartado 1571-1000
> COSTA RICA
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda en scartezini.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Estimados colegas
>>
>>  Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos
>> levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organización que deberá ser
>> contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que
>> están en la wiki acerca de:
>>
>>    1. el punto de diversidad  que para mi  es necesario que los expertos
>>    contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos países no solo clientes en estos
>>    países  y
>>    2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de
>>    experiencia en ICANN – participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo
>>    recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectual…
>>    para mi debía tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de
>>    preferencia como simples atendente para una vision más amplia de todo el
>>    complejo de ICANN
>>
>> Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios,
>> en nuestra lista o en la WIKI.
>>  Abrazos
>> *Vanda Scartezini*
>> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
>> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>*
>> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> *
>> *So**rry for any typos. *
>>
>>
>> From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of
>> ICANN Staff
>> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM
>> To: LACRALO list
>> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working
>> Party Draft Charter
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the
>> At-Large Community for its Draft Charter:
>> https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log
>> in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function
>> by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background
>> information below.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal
>> effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the
>> community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The
>> focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large
>> Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly
>> established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that
>> time.
>>
>> The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is
>> underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational
>> effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs
>> and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in
>> April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of
>> the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader
>> community are important components of this review process.
>>
>> As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness
>> Committee of the Board
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en> has
>> requested that an At-Large Review Working Party
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a
>> liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and
>> the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on
>> review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and
>> objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings
>> and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
>> action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to
>> coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan
>> and champion implementation of improvement activities.
>>
>> The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in
>> its teleconference on November 23, 2015
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open
>> for comments from RALO members.* You may download and review the draft
>> charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please
>> log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment
>> function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you don’t have a login
>> or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact
>> staff en atlarge.icann.org.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>> E-mail: staff en atlarge.icann.org
>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
>> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-es mailing list
>> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>> http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>






 Aida Noblia 



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/113b9db7d2.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es