[lac-discuss-es] = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ????

[jam en jacquelinemorris.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ???? 
 De: jam at jacquelinemorris.com

 Hola 
 Creo que hay cierta confusión. Hemos tenido un par de encuestas de consenso, en 
 2008 era una objeción a una sola candidatura, ya que es aquí. 
 En los otros casos, fue porque la teleconferencia no fue válidamente constituida, y 
 la lista es el quórum, por lo que la encuesta de consenso se hace para asegurar que el 
 decisión fue quórum. Estos casos son diferentes en la cara, y lo que debería 
 No servirá de precedente para este caso. 
 El único precedente a considerar debe ser el 2008 uno. 
 Sinceramente 
 Jacqueline Morris 


 Jacqueline A. Morris 
 La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: Ubicuo, necesario, invisible y 
 Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) 


 El mar, 28 de julio 2015 a las 6:20 de la tarde, <asoto at ibero-americano.org> escribió: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????
>  From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>
>  Dear, this is part of the mail where porqudel process explicel
>  Voting:
>
>
>  Now I want to remind you that last year we were Humberto and I, mechanics
>  applicants. We should do votaciny accept the result. There were those who
>  voted no, others abstained and others voted yes.
>
>
>  The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, unique candidate for ALAC
>  Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent.
>
>
>  Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need
>  make choice for that position.
>
>
>  We pre-meeting with the staff and then taken the decision
>  Lance was advised that the ballot will be made, taking as a precedent the
> case
>  Natalia Enciso.
>
>
>  ARE ongoing process and finalizarcon the ballot.
>
>
>  This is the mail sent before the end of the votaciny on which
>  no prior knowledge recibiningn comment is the result:
>
>
>  Before the results of the current survey on whether or not
>  Lance Hinds should be confirmed as the ALAC Representative 2015-2017
>  LACRALO would like us to establish the methodology to be utilizarpara
>  determine the results.
>
>
>  Whether a majority (over 50%) of the respondents to the
>  survey, not counting abstentions indicated NO, then the process
>  of selection of the seat currently occupied by Ftima ALAC Cambronero
>  reiniciarcon a new call for applications.
>
>
>  Otherwise, the appointment of Lance Hinds is confirmed as LACRALO
>  ALAC member for 2015-2017.
>
>
>  Remember that each RALO ALAC should choose its Member; thus
>  we have made a choice according explained, taking three background
>  Similar and applications for several members that were conducted in the
>  meeting in Buenos Aires, who felt that the process was
>  incomplete.
>
>
>  In the interest of transparency, we reported before the result of the
>  Voting next steps.
>
>
>  In this regard we believe that it has complied with the report and why
>  It corresponds to open a new period of postulacin, presentaciny ballot.
>
>
>  It is worth remembering that there are many situations that do not
> expressly estn
>  regulated as quisiramos. We must adopt a position basndonos
>  in the rules and precedents that have. When there is a situation
>  expressly regulated, we must choose one of the alternatives, reporting
>  prior to the community.
>
>
>  This is rational only solution we have found to solve this
>  such drawbacks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  best regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ---
>  Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
>  http://www.avast.com
>
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ff31dd701d.html
--]]