RESULTADOS DEL VOTO: LACRALO Confirmación encuesta - ALAC Representante (2015 AGM - 2017 AGM)

brainstreetceo en gmail.com brainstreetceo en gmail.com
Mar Jul 28 16:04:21 UTC 2015


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: RESULTADOS DEL VOTO: LACRALO Confirmación encuesta - ALAC Representante (2015 AGM - 2017 AGM) 
 De: brainstreetceo en gmail.com

 Gracias Roosevelt. Usted está absolutamente correcto. 


 atentamente 


 El mar, 28 de julio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, Roosevelt Rey <rok en bango.org.bb> escribió: 


> Dear Staff,
>
>
>
> I question your interpretation of this outcome. Since there was only one
> nomination, the onus is on the “no†vote to win. An abstention is not a
> “no†vote but it is a vote and hence even though not a yes vote, cannot be
> counted as a “no†vote. Therefore the “no†vote must exceed all other votes
> to win. In this case it has not.
>
>
>
> Note that this is not a matter of adding the abstentions to the ‘yesâ€
> vote. There are three results and for any result to win it must exceed the
> total amount of the other results plus one. Note very clearly that this is
> not a vote for more than one candidate where only the yes and no votes
> count. Here is a matter to confirm a candidate and the only way that
> candidate can lose is if the majority vote of the group votes no.
>
>
>
> Especially in this case where this is an online vote which gives the
> entire group the opportunity to vote over time. According to our rules a
> quorum is not required for an online vote for the specific fact that all
> members are deemed to be present. Unless a member is deemed inactive, it
> would seem to me that the no vote should be half of the entire group plus
> one and not just half plus one of those voting, where it should not matter
> whether or not all the other members voted yes, abstained or did not vote.
> My understanding is that LACRALO has 47 members. Hence a no vote of 23.5 +
> 1 = 24.5 votes would have to be amounted by the “no†vote in order to win.
> You are not worrying about a quorum because all members are deemed present.
> Even if you did it based on the amount voting, the no vote still loses
> since the requirement would be 21.5 + 1 votes = 22.5 votes and since there
> are no half votes, that would be 23 votes to win because you need 22.5
> votes to  win.
>
>
>
> It would seem to me that in the spirit of a democratic and transparent
> process and where one person is to be confirmed, that the onus must be on
> the “no†vote to exceed half of the members of the constituency. For those
> who abstained or did not vote, there is only one consideration and that is
> that if more than half the group did not want to confirm a candidate, they
> would rise up and ensure they voted no. That did not happen in this case.
> Sufficient people did not say no or voted no and hence the confirmation
> process is complete in favour of the candidate. Any other way of
> interpreting this can only run counter to the spirit of democracy and would
> be less than transparent. Actually bordering on unfair and manipulative.
>
>
>
> I am therefore calling on staff to recall that message and post a correct
> message based on the fact that the “no†vote needs 23 votes since all
> members are assumed present and a result is based on the majority of the
> constituency because there is only one candidate in the confirmation
> process.
>
>
>
> Thanking you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> ROK
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:
> lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *ICANN
> At-Large Staff
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 28 July 2015 09:53
> *To:* lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Subject:* [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Confirmation Poll -
> ALAC Representative (2015 AGM - 2017 AGM)
>
>
>
> == EN==
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Kindly note that the LACRALO Confirmation Poll – ALAC Representative (2015
> AGM – 2017 AGM) is now closed. Please see below the vote result being sent
> on behalf of Alberto Soto, Chair of LACRALO, and Humberto Carrasco,
> Secretary of LACRALO.
>
> —
>
> QUESTION: Do you wish to confirm Lance Hinds as the ALAC representative
> from LACRALO for the period AGM2015 through AGM2017?
>
> *Yes
>
> *No
>
> *Abstention
>
> —
>
> As at Poll close: Monday 27 July 2015 23:00 UTC
> Number of voters: 43 · Group size: 47 · Percentage voted: 91.49
> Ranked by votes
>
> *Rank*
>
> *Options*
>
> *Votes*
>
> *%*
>
> 1
>
> No/No
>
> 21
>
> 48.84
>
> 2
>
> Yes/Si
>
> 19
>
> 44.19
>
> 3
>
> Abstain/Abstención
>
> 3
>
> 6.98
>
>
>
> Counting only Yes and No votes, the percentages are:
>
> No 21/40 = 52.5%
>
> Yes 19/40 = 47.5%
>
>
>
> The selection process for the ALAC seat currently occupied by Fatima
> Cambronero will be restarted with a new call for nominations.
>
>
>
> You may view the result independently under:
> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=4940Zw4m2YAWxvmPU7PAWLyP
>
>
>
> == ES ==
>
>
>
> Hola a todos,
>
>
>
> Favor de notar que la Encuesta de Confirmación de LACRALO para el
> Representante en ALAC (2015-2017 AGM) se encuentra cerrada. Por favor,
> encuentre enseguida el resultado de la votación el cual está siendo enviado
> en nombre de Alberto Soto, Presidente de LACRALO y Humberto Carrasco,
> Secretario de LACRALO.
>
> —
>
> PREGUNTA: Desea confirmar a Lance Hinds como representante de LACRALO ante
> el ALAC para el periodo del  AGM2015 hasta el AGM2017?
>
> *Si
>
> *No
>
> *Abstención
>
> —
>
> Al cerrar el voto: Lunes 27 de Julio 2015 23:00 GMT
>
> Número de votantes: 43 · Tamaño del grupo: 47 · Porcentaje de voto: 91.49
>
> clasificado por votos
>
> *Posición*
>
> *Opciones*
>
> *Votos*
>
> *%*
>
> 1
>
> No/No
>
> 21
>
> 48.84
>
> 2
>
> Yes/Si
>
> 19
>
> 44.19
>
> 3
>
> Abstain/Abstención
>
> 3
>
> 6.98
>
>
>
> Contando solamente los votos 'Si' y 'No', los porcentajes son:
>
> No 21/40 = 52.5%
>
> Si 19/40 = 47.5%
>
>
>
> El proceso de selección para el asiento de ALAC actualmente ocupado por
> Fátima Cambronero será reiniciado a través de una nueva convocatoria.
>
>
>
> Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo:
> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=4940Zw4m2YAWxvmPU7PAWLyP
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>
> E-mail: staff en atlarge.icann.org
>
> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>
> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>




 Lanza Hinds 
 Jefe De Tecnología 
 BrainStreet Grupo 
 287 'C' Albert St. 
 Georgetown Guyana 








 Este mensaje contiene información que puede contener información privilegiada y / o 
 confidencial y es propiedad de Tecnologías BrainStreet o BrainStreet 
 Aprender. La información contenida en este documento está destinado sólo para la 
 persona o entidad a quien va dirigida y otros autorizado para 
 recíbelo .Si usted no es el destinatario previsto, no está autorizado 
 para leer, imprimir, retener, copiar, divulgar, distribuir o tomar cualquier acción 
 confiando al contenido de esta información o parte de ella y 
 puede ser ilegal hacerlo. Si recibe este mensaje por error, por favor 
 notifique inmediatamente al remitente y elimine todas las copias de este mensaje 
 su sistema. Tecnologías BrainStreet o BrainStreet aprendizaje son ni 
 responsable de la transmisión adecuada y completa de la información 
 contenida en esta comunicación ni ningún retraso en su recepción. 



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/942a5cd3e2.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es