[lac-discuss-es] NETmundial - Importante

Dom Abr 20 17:41:41 UTC 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: NETmundial - Importante 
 De: josefranciscoarce en gmail.com

 Olivier, Fátima, 

 Gracias por tus comentarios. Se parece ese período de comentarios públicos formales hace 
 no encaja en alguna situación (como este), así que tal vez es una cosa para revisar o 
 discutir. 
 En cuanto Netmundial soy muy feliz de ver a tantos amigos que participan. Yo 
 de acuerdo con Fátima en relación con el sombrero, y tenemos que confiar en nuestro miembro como 
 individuos o represenring su empresa o 
 organización, de forma independiente. Porque 
 como hemos tryed para llegar de la reunión de Buenos Aires, tener un lugar formal en 
 netmundial, pero ICANN no piensa que somos parte de la sociedad civil y 
 no tomó At-grande en acount. 
 Le deseamos todo lo mejor en la reunión 
 Nos vemos remotly 

 Jose 
 El abr 20, 2014 13:40, &quot;Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond&quot; <ocl en gih.com>
 escribio: 

>  Dear Fatima,
>
> thank you for your kind follow-up. You make a very good point about the WG
> having no charter yet so I should wear the ALAC Chair hat. See you in SÃ£o
> Paulo!
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> On 20/04/2014 18:32, Fatima Cambronero wrote:
>
> Dear Olivier,
>
> Thanks for your email and your explanation about the Cross Community
> Working Group on Internet Governance and the document elaborated to
> NetMundial.
> Regarding the hat that you need to wear to the meeting, in my opinion you
> should wear the ALAC Chair hat.
> The CCWG on IG has not Charter yet and as you explain the document has not
> received input from the community yet.
> I will look forward to meeting with you and LACRALO's colleagues attending
> Sao Paulo meeting.
>
> Have a safe trip.
>
> Best Regards,
> Fatima
>
>
>
> 2014-04-20 12:44 GMT-03:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl en gih.com>:
>
>> Dear JosÃ©,
>>
>> thank you for your kind email.
>> As you correctly say, the Cross Community Working Group on Internet
>> Governance has submitted a document to NetMundial. During the public
>> session of the Working Group with the community, the audience suggested
>> that we send the document out for a public comment. This was agreed by
>> the group. The only problem is that a formal public comment period is
>> minimum 21 days initial comment period and 21 days reply comment period
>> = 42 days.... and Netmundial was less than 30 days away!!! The working
>> group was not allowed to make the comment period shorter.
>>
>> Some members of the working group reminded us that NetMundial is not the
>> start and the end of the discussion. There will be other meetings on
>> Internet Governance after NetMundial, so it was decided by the working
>> group members that it should launch an ICANN-wide formal public comment
>> and that working group members could use the input received to expand on
>> any points during NetMundial and could also use the information after
>> NetMundial for future meetings.
>>
>> That said, it also looks like many cross community working group members
>> are going to NetMundial to defend their own point of view, as a member
>> of their community or sometimes as a member of their company or
>> organisation, independently from the working group.
>>
>> I will be going to SÃ£o Paulo and frankly, I do not know what hat I need
>> to wear. Do I need to wear the hat of the coordinator of the cross
>> community working group? Do I need to wear the ALAC Chair hat?
>> There will also be many members of At-Large at NetMundial and
>> specifically several members from LACRALO. I will look forward to
>> meeting with them and to coordinate the points that we want to defend
>> together. Our community have local ALSes and several members who are
>> very experienced in Internet Governance - I hope we can make use of them.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>> On 19/04/2014 15:41, josefranciscoarce en gmail.com wrote:
>> > 2)
>> >  Likewise this period pblicos comments in the document
>> >  group &quot;ICANN
>> >  Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance's Submission to
>> >  NETMundial &quot;which expires on April 29,
>> >  I consider some logical since Netmundial serel 23 and April 24. Not
>> >  understand the true scope of the group as they must have a job
>> >  Preview Netmundial ready before and no later.
>> >  Hopefully one of its members will not store in the list (Olivier, Leon
>> Felipe)
>> >  Here the other Member
>> >
>> https://community.icann.org/display/CPMMB/ICANN+Community+Preparation+for+the+Multistakeholder+Meeting+in+Brazil+Home
>> >
>> >
>> >  Comment Period:
>> >
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/ccwg-ig-netmundial-08apr14-en.htm
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  *Fatima Cambronero*
> Abogada-Argentina
>
>  Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
> Twitter: @facambronero
> Skype: fatima.cambronero
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
 lac-discuss-es mailing list 
 lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en  

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d41038f7a6.html
--]]