R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección

veronicacretu en gmail.com veronicacretu en gmail.com
Sab Abr 5 08:08:35 UTC 2014


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección 
 De: veronicacretu en gmail.com

 Estimados colegas, saludos! 


 Me parece que este intercambio de ideas, opiniones y reflexiones de gran valor! Yo 
 Sólo puedo imaginar lo que una maravillosa actividad cara a cara este podría ser con 
 -en general los miembros de intercambio de ideas y 'diseñar' el futuro a través del prisma 
 de la historia y los acontecimientos actuales :)! 


 Pocas reflexiones sobre algunos de los aspectos, a partir de mi experiencia de estar en 
 Comité de nominaciones de este año (y parte de 2013 NomCom): 


 - Cuando se trata de el nivel de competencia de los miembros del Comité de nominaciones (ya que este aspecto 
 ha sido tocado por Adán y Alejandro), creo que podría valer la pena para 
 el Comité de Nominaciones de tener una herramienta de evaluación de la capacidad / competencia que permitiría 
 para un "escaneo" de qué competencias hay dentro del comité 
 sí, y qué competencias son necesarias.Antes de que cualquier "nuevo" Comité de nominaciones es 
 nombrado / seleccionado, esta evaluación tiene que hacerse, y los nombramientos del 
 nuevos miembros estarían en línea con algunos de los desaparecidos 
 elementos / competencias, etc 


 Todos y cada uno de los miembros del Comité de Nominaciones trae ciertos conocimientos, 
 habilidades / conocimientos y experiencias por diferentes sectores (no sólo ICANN / IG 
 relacionado). El grado en que NomCom logra crear o construir sinergia 
 entre estos valiosos 'atributos' de los miembros, determina la calidad 
 del proceso de selección de hecho. 


 - El mismo tipo de evaluación / enfoque debería tener lugar en el nivel de 
 la Junta - y sin una idea clara de las áreas y las competencias clave 
 necesario, es difícil de llevar en el 'más adecuado' para el contexto dado, 
 dada la realidad y el tipo de futuro se pretende construir / crear 
 de / dentro del ecosistema de la ICANN. 


 Por lo tanto, tener una herramienta de Evaluación de la Capacidad Junta y una capacidad NomCom 
 Herramienta de evaluación sería de hecho garantizar la continuidad de las estructuras y 
 continuaría en traer los "ataques correctas" cuando sea necesario. 
 Institucionalización del enfoque podría tardar 2-3 años, después de un piloto 
 resultados de fase estarían disponibles.


 Un gran fin de semana por delante todo el mundo! 


 Con lo mejor, 
 Verónica 




 El viernes, 04 de abril 2014 a las 4:31 AM, Adam Peake <ajp en glocom.ac.jp> escribió: 


> Hi Alejandro,
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:
>
> > Adam,
> >
> > this reply of mine will only go to some lists (it is too much
> cross-posted.)
> >
>
> And there still is.  It's quite a collection of addresses.
>
>
> > Your admission in the last sentence is the key to simplifying this
> discussion of the ICANN NomCom and giving it some realistic focus.
> >
> > You say that you often felt inadequate in judging the merits of
> candidates who were way above your capacity. You should have resigned at
> that very moment but let's skip that part and go into a more general
> statement.
> >
>
>
> I didn't quite say what you have interpreted me as saying.  But it was a
> throw-away comment, and you got my meaning below:
>
>
> > The design of the NomCom foresaw an implementation in which every
> community that designates members of the NomCom would send a "senior
> statesperson", someone who would exert stewardship over the greater good,
> without disregarding that communities' own interests and driving
> principles. In practice this failed to happen. Instead frequently the
> communities designated non-independent, junior people who had to prove
> their merit to the community in the NomCom and could hope for some reward
> later on.
> >
>
>
> To a degree yes, too often I felt the NomCom delegate position wasn't much
> of priority to the sending group -- perhaps only welcome when someone
> realized it meant an extra person from their group being funded to attend a
> couple of meetings.  On the other hand, there's usually a smattering of
> former board members or people with some equal experience in each
> committee.  Though very few have experience in high-level recruitment,
> evaluation etc.
>
> People I've served with took their role seriously, worked hard, were
> honest, and produced overall good results.  The process has improved over
> the years.  This year's committee had a bit of training in a few relevant
> HR techniques (should have started years ago).  NomCom membership needs an
> urgent reworking, other than that, I think it does what it's asked.
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
> > This breakdown in trust and resignation of stewardship has been toxic.
> There is nothing that can be written in the rules that can cause change
> towards a stewardship and earning-trust model. It has to be the action of
> the community itself that begins thinking less of how to get a larger size
> of the pie and more of how to make the pie better.
> >
> > Therefore I think that this is the worst of times for a major rethink of
> the NomCom and other processes that get Directors to the Board. Change may
> be needed, though what change is needed is a very open discussion. But the
> thing to focus on right now is the substitution of the NTIA's function,
> nothing more. If that implies other changes these must be very convincing.
> >
> > Yours,
> >
> > Alejandro Pisanty
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp en glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-)  And each year the
> community was asked for input on the criteria.
> >
> > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex
> organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job.  Doesn't
> mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs
> to be present.  And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many
> learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and
> $millions.  Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that
> fits the pure "large corporate board" category.
> >
> > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought.  I often felt a
> fraud judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >
> > > Carlton,
> > >
> > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be
> > > thoroughly revised.
> > >
> > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to
> > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the
> ideal
> > > Director profile is "in aggregate".
> > >
> > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible
> knowledge
> > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole,
> needs
> > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each
> and
> > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is
> not
> > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be
> > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean
> that
> > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be
> > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need,
> > > "non-profit boards" is well another one.
> > >
> > > So the two big questions are:
> > >
> > > -          How to cefine the requirements for NomCom
> > >
> > > -          How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current
> mechanism
> > > the best one?)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Roberto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels en gmail.com]
> > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56
> > > A: Roberto Gaetano
> > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang;
> > > lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of
> lac-discuss;
> > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss
> > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss]
> [At-Large]
> > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Roberto:
> > >
> > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic
> and
> > > in the overarching At-Large interest.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot
> accept
> > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with
> > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to
> 'take
> > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group.  This
> is my
> > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly
> elected
> > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as
> truly
> > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly
> > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the
> At-Large than
> > > the single voting director.  So while we are largely agreed, I have one
> > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set
> of
> > > criteria utilised for selection of directors.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that
> space
> > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria
> between
> > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those
> without.
> > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of  the meaning of
> > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely
> > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already
> > > disadvantaged.  And that does not augur well for participation at that
> level
> > > for those of us at the edge of empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > -Carlton
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ==============================
> > > Carlton A Samuels
> > > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> > > =============================
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano
> > > <roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the
> Board
> > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations.
> > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now,
> years
> > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle
> of
> > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the
> > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model.
> > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the
> > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative
> "strength". The
> > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where
> the
> > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic
> laws
> > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by
> > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of
> the
> > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the
> elders
> > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common
> good.
> > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review,
> albeit
> > > with only partial, although significant, results.
> > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get
> rid as
> > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of
> "parties"
> > > that often have conflicting interests.
> > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed
> Directors, and
> > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by
> NomCom.
> > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that
> is
> > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names
> > > accordingly.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Roberto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Messaggio originale-----
> > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:
> euro-discuss-
> > >> bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M
> > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27
> > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
> > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es en atlarge-
> > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> > > afri-discuss en atlarge-
> > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide;
> na-
> > >> discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS:
> 2014
> > >
> > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
> > >>
> > >
> > >> Dear Wolfgang,
> > >>
> > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to
> > > ensure an
> > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in
> the
> > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared
> > >> responsibility in the selection process.
> > >>
> > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would
> > > positively
> > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi-
> > >> stakeholder model of Governance.
> > >>
> > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent
> and
> > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large
> has
> > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you
> > > have
> > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people,
> > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even
> > > more.
> > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats
> which
> > > would
> > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other
> Stakeholders
> > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the
> > > Board,
> > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process.
> > >>
> > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed
> by two
> > >> different processes:
> > >>
> > >> 1)  By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a
> candidate
> > > and
> > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which
> could
> > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist
> within
> > >> this AC at the moment.
> > >>
> > >> 2)  By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an
> internal
> > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a
> > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered)
> > >>
> > >> Thank you.
> > >>
> > >> Sivasubramanian M
> > >> India
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
> > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter en medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to
> > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing
> > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured.
> > >>>
> > >>> I this context: Don´t forget the History. In the present NTIA
> > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are
> > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine
> > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6,
> > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine
> > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be
> > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of
> the
> > >> Initial Board".
> > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-
> > >> en.htm#
> > >>> V
> > >>>
> > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for
> > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee,
> > >> chaired
> > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large
> Supporting
> > >>> Organisation
> > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h
> > >>> tm#_toc523422641
> > >>>
> > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an
> > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional
> > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory
> > >> Committee"
> > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the
> > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the
> > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC
> > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to
> > >>> the chair of the GAC).
> > >>>
> > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for
> > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the
> > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the
> > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has
> > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong
> > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos
> > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and
> > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination
> and
> > >> collaboration with
> > >>> private sector, technical community and governments.   A big
> challenge.
> > >>>
> > >>> Wolfgang
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> wolfgang
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>>
> > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von
> > >>> Veronica Cretu
> > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55
> > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> > >>> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> > >>> euro-discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> > >>> afri-discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> > >>> ALAC-Announce en atlarge-lists.icann.org;
> > >>> apac-discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide;
> > >>> na-discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large
> > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo
> > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to:
> > >>>
> > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of
> > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and
> > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so
> > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who
> can
> > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share
> > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and
> > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her
> > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are
> > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences,
> > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the
> > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on
> > > the
> > >> community-at-large.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has
> > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience
> > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input
> > > from
> > >> members.
> > >>>
> > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home
> > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home!
> > >>>
> > >>> With very best,
> > >>> Veronica
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> > >>> <ocl en gih.com
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Dear All,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what
> > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to
> > >>>> differentiate the candidates.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a
> > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for
> > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual
> > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take
> > >>>> place in Los Angeles.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is
> > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of
> > >>>> options for the future of our community.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation
> > >> Committee.
> > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of
> > >>>> candidates.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process
> > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been
> > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons
> > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of
> > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM,
> > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and
> > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the
> > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on
> > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community
> > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to
> > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues
> > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of
> > > ICANN.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Kindest regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
> > >>>> ALAC Chair
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote:
> > >>>>> Dear All,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process
> > >>>>> Committee
> > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote
> > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the
> > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be
> > >> published.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat
> > >>>>> #15)
> > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>> family name) who ran for the position:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *   Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> > >>>>> *   Sébastien Bachollet
> > >>>>> *   Alan Greenberg
> > >>>>> *   Evan Leibovitch
> > >>>>> *   Jean-Jacques Subrenat
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie
> > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is
> > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for
> > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information
> > >>>>> about
> > >>>> the selection procedure, under:
> https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber,
> > >>>>> Nathalie
> > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
> > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
> > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org%
> > >>> 3cmailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org
> > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff en atlarge.icann.org> >
> > >>>> staff en atlarge.icann.org
> > >>>>
> > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-
> > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%
> > >>>
> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G
> > >>> isella%20Gruber,%
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy
> > >> %20St
> > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org
> > > <mailto:
> aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff en atlarge.icann.o
> > > rg>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> At-Large mailing list
> > >>>>> At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <
> > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> > >>>> EURO-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
> > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Veronica Cretu *
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova
> > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>*
> > >>>
> > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, *
> > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);*
> > >>> *
> > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-
> > >> and-cu
> > >>> rrent-membership
> > >>> <
> > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-
> > >> and-cu
> > >>> rrent-membership
> > >>>> *
> > >>>
> > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet
> > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)*
> > >>>
> > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549
> > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>*
> > >>>
> > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation
> > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)*
> > >>>
> > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members
> > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >*
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *Email: veronicacretu en gmail.com <veronicacretu en gmail.com> and/or
> > >>> veronica en cretu.md <veronica en cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone:
> > >> 373
> > >>> 067435000*
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> > >>> EURO-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
> > >>>
> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
> > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list
> > >>> APAC-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
> > >>>
> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> > >> EURO-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
> > >>
> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lac-discuss-es mailing list
> > > lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> > >
> > > http://www.lacralo.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list
> > > EURO-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
> > >
> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lac-discuss-es mailing list
> > lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> >
> > http://www.lacralo.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> > Facultad de Química UNAM
> > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> > .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
> _______________________________________________
> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> EURO-Discuss en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
>
> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4f5005932b.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es