Re "Introducción de dos caracteres de nombres de dominio en el Nuevo gTLD Namespace" Los comentarios del público

[devtee en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Re "Introducción de dos caracteres de nombres de dominio en el Nuevo gTLD Namespace" Los comentarios del público 
 De: devtee en gmail.com

 Bueno, sólo puede haber un número fijo de permutaciones (676) para su posible 
 utilizar en la norma ISO 3166 desde ISO 3166 sólo puede ser letras ASCII de AA a ZZ. Y 
 Si bien puede no ser un número rápido de cambios, se han producido cambios 
 ISO 3166 en los últimos 10 años. 


 Por ejemplo, en 2010, por ejemplo: 
 http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_3166-1_newsletter_vi-8_split_of_the_dutch_antilles_final-en.pdf 


 BQ, CW y SX se añadieron para Bonaire, San Eustaquio y Saba, Curaçao 
 y Sint Maarten (parte neerlandesa) en el Caribe. 


 Dev Anand 










 El Jueves, 10 de julio 2014 a las 8:47 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
 escribió: 


> Closely reasoned and from the principle of cc assignment certainly worthy
> of the ALAC's consideration.
>
> While we're at it, lets consider that 3-character country codes are
> possible.
>
> Giving protection for a future event suggests we have a definite knowledge
> of country/territory breakdown and thusly, possible code assignment.  Tying
> up all permutations of 2 characters especially when you consider IDNs would
> be a tough sell.
>
> Carlton
> ---------'--------''-----
>
> On Jul 10, 2014 2:04 AM, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee en gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the public comment on "Introduction of Two-Character Domain
> Names
> > in the New gTLD Namespace" at https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg
> > which ends July 10 2014, I've posted the following at
> > https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg
> > for consideration:
> >
> > "Various registries for multiple gTLDs are applying for exceptions to
> > Specification 5, Section 2 of the New gTLD Registry Agreement
> > ("Specification 5") with some registries suggesting the release of 2
> > character ASCII labels not on the current ISO 3166 standard would
> suffice.
> >
> > While this seems harmless, there is a possibility of new countries and
> > territories being created, and then allocated a new two character ASCII
> > label by ISO 3166/MA (see
> >
> https://web.archive.org/web/20111101141651/http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm
> > ).
> >
> > Any new country or territory created after 2014 would therefore not
> receive
> > the same protection as those in the 2014 ISO 3166-2 list and would find
> > that their new 2 character label is "given away", should they wish for
> > their 2 character ASCII label to be protected, as per Specification 5.
> >
> > Now, should the principle established by Specification 5 protecting 2
> > character ASCII labels even be in the New gTLD Registry Agreement? Many
> > would say, especially given the prevalence of two character labels in
> > existing TLDs like .com, .org and .net that this principle shouldn't be
> > applied to new gTLDs.
> > However, this (IMO) is a separate issue to the question being asked for
> in
> > the public comment.
> >
> > If Specification 5 is meant to defend the principle that country codes in
> > ISO 3166-2 should be protected in new gTLDs, then it should be enforced
> to
> > ensure future countries and territories with new 2 character ASCII labels
> > are protected in the same way as those territories and countries in
> today's
> > ISO 3166-2 list.
> >
> > Therefore, the proposals by Donuts for 143 of its new gTLDS, .kred by
> > KredTLD Pty Ltd, .best by BestTLD Pty Ltd and .ceo by CEOTLD Pty Ltd.
> > should be turned down in keeping with the principle of Specification 5.
> >
> > The proposal by .wiki by Top Level Design LLC which specifies that the
> two
> > character ASCII labels will only be used for languages identified by ISO
> > 639-1 does appear to meet the threshold that the use will not be confused
> > with the corresponding country codes, as per Specification 5 and could be
> > approved.
> >
> > Similarly, the proposal by .globo by Globo Comunicação e Participações
> S.A
> > which proposed the use of two character ASCII labels that are not letters
> > or by two characters where only one of the character is a letter are
> labels
> > that would not be used by ISO 3166-2 and could be approved."
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> > _______________________________________________
> > lac-discuss-en mailing list
> > lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
 lac-discuss-es mailing list 
 lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en  
 


[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2fe20b851c.html
--]]