Polémica por votación icann Propuesto

[cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Polémica por votación icann Propuesto 
 Desde: cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com

 La traducción Inglés de este hilo tiene muy poco sentido. Lo sentimos, pero 
 debido a esto no puedo contribuir en este importante tema. 


 Saludos 


 Cintra Sooknanan 




 El Jue, 21 de agosto 2014 a las 4:32 pm, <asoto en ibero-americano.org> escribió: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re: Controversy over Proposed icann voting
>  From: asoto en ibero-americano.org
>
>  Ftima barbarian, this type of discussion always approached us a good
>  position. I just need you to clarify my argument to mean.
>
>
>  Thank you
>
>
>  Alberto
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  From: Fatima Cambronero [mailto: fatimacambronero en gmail.com]
>  Posted on: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:22 pm
>  To: Alberto Soto
>  CC: Alejandro Pisanty; HUMBERTO CARRASCO;
>  lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Controversy over Proposed icann voting
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Alberto forgiveness, I do not agree at all that argument. And I'll put a
>  good graphic example to be understood: because there murdering people
>  then there deberamos usually have laws that punish murder?
>
>
>  Forgiveness for errors and brevity, I'm on the street.
>
>
>  Fatima
>
>
>  Aug 21, 2014 4:17 PM, &quot;Alberto Soto&quot; <asoto en ibero-americano.org
> <mailto:asoto en ibero-americano.org> &gt; I wrote:
>
>
>  Another comment ms. In other internal lists or workgroups within
>  ICANN, I'm sensing that they dont change or not, that are
>  seldom happen that a rejection that is not of major importance,
>  etc, etc.
>  I think besides who participate in various forums, deberamos
>  forward and discuss whether in our opinion the same is necessary .....
>  Best Regards
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On Behalf Of
>  Alberto
>  Soto
>  Posted on: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:44 pm
>  To: 'Humberto Carrasco'; 'Alejandro Pisanty'
>  CC: lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Controversy over Proposed icann voting
>
>
>  The comment period closes on 09/14/2014 at 2300UTC.
>  I think in addition to wait for our document, all should go read it
>  we send yan search on your own. Arguments can invoke
>  perhaps are not in the document, but to be themselves or others.
>  We should note that as I said several times, representatives of
>  end users are us, not governments involved in the
>  GAC. Many governments generate appropriate policies for end users,
>  but not always ...
>  Best Regards
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On Behalf Of
>  Humberto Carrasco Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:22 pm
>  To: Alejandro Pisanty
>  CC: lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Controversy over Proposed icann voting
>
>
>  Dear Alejandro,
>
>
>
>
>  I am writing the proposal declaracinyan not trmino.
>
>
>  Just finished and opened to the public comments.
>
>
>  It will be soon.
>
>
>
>
>  Greetings
>
>
>  Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> > El 21-08-2014, a las 19:17, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty en gmail.com
>  I wrote:
>  >
> > Humberto,
> >
> > por algo insistimos en que organices la discusión y la emisión de un
>  >
> > Hasta ahora has recibido solamente expresiones en contra del cambio de
>  >
> > Nadie, ni siquiera nuestros representantes ante ALAC, ha expresado
>  interview.
>  >
> > Hemos hecho alusión a quienes, en LACRALO, han acudido a gobiernos
> > para
>  manifest?
>  >
> > ¿El debate ha terminado?
> >
> > Alejandro Pisanty
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Humberto Carrasco
>  >> Hi all,
>  >>
>  >> To see the relevance of the subject to which it refiriVanda.
>  >>
>  Http://www.itworldcanada.com/post/controversy
> &gt;&gt;-over-proposed-icann-vot
>  Ing &gt;&gt;
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  Greetings &gt;&gt;
>  >>
>  _______________________________________________ &gt;&gt;
>  Lac-discuss-&gt;&gt;'s mailing list
>  Lac-discuss-&gt;&gt; es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  >>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>  >>
>  Http://www.lacralo.org &gt;&gt;
>  >
>  >
>  >
> > --
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> > Facultad de Química UNAM
> > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> > .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/97f1fdf266.html
--]]