Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para el Director de la Junta elegidos por At-Large ya está abierto a través de 26 de diciembre 2013

carlton.samuels en gmail.com carlton.samuels en gmail.com
Mar Dic 3 14:12:01 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para el Director de la Junta elegidos por At-Large ya está abierto a través de 26 de diciembre 2013 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 Bien razonado. 1 


 -Carlton 




 ============================== 
 Carlton Un Samuels 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * 
 ============================= 




 El mar, 03 de diciembre 2013 a las 6:48 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl en gih.com> escribió: 


> Dear José,
>
> I have been reading this thread with much interest.
>
> Regarding how a Board member has to act on the Board, it is true that a
> Board member needs to act in the best interests of ICANN when on the
> Board and is not there to relay the point of view of the community
> having appointed them.
>
> That said, a Board member selected by At-Large will hopefully have the
> same values as the At-Large Community. It is by reasoning using these
> same values, that the Board member will reflect the views which are held
> in our community. So there is no direct link between what the community
> decides and what the Board member selected by the community decides -
> only a cultural understanding of the community which lets the Board
> member make up their mind as to what is better for the Public Interest.
>
> I realise this is a hard subject, one which every Board member needs to
> think about.
>
> Do the categories for review need to be very precise and therefore
> include the requirement of the Board member knowing their community? I
> think that we need to trust the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee to
> make up its own mind. I also think that we need to trust the Electorate
> too. Let people make up their own mind and not be too prescriptive.
>
> That's just my own point of view.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 03/12/2013 12:12, José Francisco Arce wrote:
> > Thanks Tijiani for the clarification.
> > But I still think that we should have 3 different  EoI, because if
> > knowlege of at-large community is a general requirement to be a Board
> > Member I can not imagine that all the current menmber of the borad
> > have that backgraund, and for my point of view they do not have to
> > have it. It is crazy to think that, so the actual documment for the 3
> > categories should be review.
> > Maybe Olivier can add something that we are missing.
> >
> > My 2 cents
> >
> > José Arce
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/2 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn
> > <mailto:tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn>>
> >
> >     Hi José,
> >
> >
> >
> >     Sorry for the late reply. In fact, the EoI is the duty of the
> >     BCEC, and this reply is a personal opinion.
> >
> >
> >
> >     You know, the requirements that you mentioned was in 3 categories:
> >
> >     ·        The requirements for the board members in the ICANN bylaws
> >
> >     ·        The requirements for a board member used by the NomCom
> >
> >     ·        And additional At-Large requirements
> >
> >
> >
> >     I think that what appeared as a contradiction for you is the
> >     result of the combination of the 3 categories.
> >
> >     It’s true that a board member is supposed to serve for the benefit
> >     of ICANN as a whole, and not as a representative of a certain
> >     stakeholder, but you don’t imagine ALAC appointing someone who
> >     doesn’t know anything of the end users’ concerns and interests. I
> >     think that it’s normal that the candidate should be well aware of
> >     the At-Large affairs. While selected, this Board member will act
> >     as an individual for the benefit of ICANN, but with his/her
> >     background and his knowledge of the At-Large community.
> >
> >
> >
> >     My 2 cents
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> >
> >     Executive Director
> >
> >     Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> >
> >     Phone:  + 216 41 649 605
> >
> >     Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
> >
> >     Fax:       + 216 70 853 376
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     *De :*José Francisco Arce [mailto:josefranciscoarce en gmail.com
> >     <mailto:josefranciscoarce en gmail.com>]
> >     *Envoyé :* lundi 2 décembre 2013 11:48
> >     *À :* ICANN At-Large Staff
> >     *Cc :* lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >     <mailto:lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>; Roberto Gaetano
> >     (roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com
> >     <mailto:roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com>); Tijani BEN JEMAA
> >     (tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn>);
> >     Olivier Crépin-Leblond
> >     *Objet :* Re: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
> >     for the Board Director Selected by At-Large now open through 26
> >     December 2013
> >
> >
> >
> >     Dear Tijiani and Roberto,
> >
> >
> >
> >     Any comment about my email. I know that we are runing out of time
> >     now, but I really see contradictions in the text which may confuse
> >     candidates and applicants.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Kind Regards
> >
> >
> >
> >     José Arce
> >
> >
> >
> >     2013/11/27 José Francisco Arce <josefranciscoarce en gmail.com
> >     <mailto:josefranciscoarce en gmail.com>>
> >
> >     Dear all,
> >
> >     I read the document and have some questions:
> >
> >
> >
> >     1) Regarding the first paragraph: “/…member must be able to
> >     reflect the users' point of view and interests in the debate and
> >     decision making undertaken within the ICANN framework”./
> >
> >     The last two times LACRALO talked about this issue, and the last
> >     was in Buenos Aires meeting, with Fatima´s question to Sébastien
> >     Bachollet, the answer was the same: Once the candidate is elect,
> >     is a Board member without identifying a group, and does not have
> >     to explain to the community that vote for him/her, but the entire
> >     community at large.
> >
> >     Even more the text included mentioned the requirement of
> >     background in Internet users' interests. Should this be a specific
> >     requirement? Or Should be only global requirements? And it seems
> >     there is a contradiction with the part: /What does an ICANN Board
> >     Director do? “ Serve as individuals who have the duty to act in
> >     what they reasonably believe are the best interests of ICANN and
> >     not as representatives of the entity that selected them, their
> >     employers or any other organizations or constituencies;”/
> >
> >     If this is my confusion, requested the appropriate apologies.
> >
> >
> >
> >     2) I know it is controversial subject, but the third paragraph
> >     defined what is “At-large”, and I want to know if there is
> >     consensus about this.
> >
> >
> >
> >     I´ll appreciate a clarification
> >
> >
> >
> >     Kind regards
> >
> >
> >
> >     José Arce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     2013/11/26 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff en atlarge.icann.org
> >     <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org>>
> >
> >         Dear All,
> >
> >         On behalf of Roberto Gaetano, Chair of the Board Candidate
> >         Evaluation Committee (BCEC), please find attached the Call for
> >         Expressions of Interest for the Board Director selected by
> >         At-Large (in English, French and Spanish).
> >
> >         The document contains the link for the online application.
> >
> >         Applications will be accepted between 26 November and 26
> >         December 2013 at 23:59 UTC.
> >
> >         The Board Director occupying Seat 15 will join the ICANN Board
> >         at the conclusion of 2014 ICANN Annual General Meeting, in
> >         October 2014.
> >
> >         Regards,
> >
> >         Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber,
> >         Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in
> >         support of ALAC
> >         E-mail: staff en atlarge.icann.org
> >         <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org><mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org<mailto:
> staff en atlarge.icann.org><mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org
> >         <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org>%
> 3cmailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org
> >         <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff en atlarge.icann.org>>>
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         lac-discuss-en mailing list
> >         lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >         <mailto:lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> >         https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     Arce, José F.
> >     http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     Arce, José F.
> >     http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Arce, José F.
> > http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2982e0291f.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es