Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para el Director de la Junta elegidos por At-Large ya está abierto a través de 26 de diciembre 2013
ocl en gih.com
ocl en gih.com
Mar Dic 3 11:49:02 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para el Director de la Junta elegidos por At-Large ya está abierto a través de 26 de diciembre 2013
De: ocl en gih.com
Querido José,
He estado leyendo este hilo con mucho interés.
En cuanto a cómo un miembro de la Junta tiene que actuar en el Consejo, es cierto que un
Miembro de la Junta tiene que actuar en los mejores intereses de ICANN cuando en la
Junta y no está allí para transmitir el punto de vista de la comunidad
haberlos nombrado.
Dicho esto, un miembro del Consejo elegido por At-Large con suerte tendrá la
mismos valores que la Comunidad At-Large. Es por el razonamiento utilizando estos
mismos valores, que el miembro de la Junta reflejará los puntos de vista que se celebran
en nuestra comunidad. Así que no hay relación directa entre lo que la comunidad
decide y lo que el miembro de la Junta elegido por la comunidad decide -
sólo una comprensión cultural de la comunidad, que permite al Consejo
miembro componen su mente sobre lo que es mejor para el interés público.
Me doy cuenta de que este es un tema difícil, una que cada miembro de la Junta debe
pensar.
¿Las categorías para la revisión deben ser muy precisos y por lo tanto
incluir el requisito de la miembro de la Junta sabiendo que su comunidad? Yo
Pensamos que tenemos que confiar en el Comité de Evaluación de Candidatos al Consejo
forman parte de su propia mente. También creo que tenemos que confiar en el electorado
también. Deja que la gente hace sus propias decisiones y no ser demasiado prescriptivo.
Eso es sólo mi punto de vista.
Saludos cordiales,
Olivier
El 12/03/2013 12:12, JosFrancisco Arce escribió:
> Thanks Tijiani for the clarification.
> But I still think that we should have 3 different EoI, because if
> knowlege of at-large community is a general requirement to be a Board
> Member I can not imagine that all the current menmber of the borad
> have that backgraund, and for my point of view they do not have to
> have it. It is crazy to think that, so the actual documment for the 3
> categories should be review.
> Maybe Olivier can add something that we are missing.
>
> My 2 cents
>
> José Arce
>
>
>
> 2013/12/2 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn
> <mailto:tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn>>
>
> Hi José,
>
>
>
> Sorry for the late reply. In fact, the EoI is the duty of the
> BCEC, and this reply is a personal opinion.
>
>
>
> You know, the requirements that you mentioned was in 3 categories:
>
> · The requirements for the board members in the ICANN bylaws
>
> · The requirements for a board member used by the NomCom
>
> · And additional At-Large requirements
>
>
>
> I think that what appeared as a contradiction for you is the
> result of the combination of the 3 categories.
>
> It’s true that a board member is supposed to serve for the benefit
> of ICANN as a whole, and not as a representative of a certain
> stakeholder, but you don’t imagine ALAC appointing someone who
> doesn’t know anything of the end users’ concerns and interests. I
> think that it’s normal that the candidate should be well aware of
> the At-Large affairs. While selected, this Board member will act
> as an individual for the benefit of ICANN, but with his/her
> background and his knowledge of the At-Large community.
>
>
>
> My 2 cents
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>
> Executive Director
>
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>
> Phone: + 216 41 649 605
>
> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
>
> Fax: + 216 70 853 376
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :*José Francisco Arce [mailto:josefranciscoarce en gmail.com
> <mailto:josefranciscoarce en gmail.com>]
> *Envoyé :* lundi 2 décembre 2013 11:48
> *À :* ICANN At-Large Staff
> *Cc :* lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>; Roberto Gaetano
> (roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com
> <mailto:roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com>); Tijani BEN JEMAA
> (tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa en planet.tn>);
> Olivier Crépin-Leblond
> *Objet :* Re: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
> for the Board Director Selected by At-Large now open through 26
> December 2013
>
>
>
> Dear Tijiani and Roberto,
>
>
>
> Any comment about my email. I know that we are runing out of time
> now, but I really see contradictions in the text which may confuse
> candidates and applicants.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> José Arce
>
>
>
> 2013/11/27 José Francisco Arce <josefranciscoarce en gmail.com
> <mailto:josefranciscoarce en gmail.com>>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I read the document and have some questions:
>
>
>
> 1) Regarding the first paragraph: “/…member must be able to
> reflect the users' point of view and interests in the debate and
> decision making undertaken within the ICANN framework”./
>
> The last two times LACRALO talked about this issue, and the last
> was in Buenos Aires meeting, with Fatima´s question to Sébastien
> Bachollet, the answer was the same: Once the candidate is elect,
> is a Board member without identifying a group, and does not have
> to explain to the community that vote for him/her, but the entire
> community at large.
>
> Even more the text included mentioned the requirement of
> background in Internet users' interests. Should this be a specific
> requirement? Or Should be only global requirements? And it seems
> there is a contradiction with the part: /What does an ICANN Board
> Director do? “ Serve as individuals who have the duty to act in
> what they reasonably believe are the best interests of ICANN and
> not as representatives of the entity that selected them, their
> employers or any other organizations or constituencies;”/
>
> If this is my confusion, requested the appropriate apologies.
>
>
>
> 2) I know it is controversial subject, but the third paragraph
> defined what is “At-large”, and I want to know if there is
> consensus about this.
>
>
>
> I´ll appreciate a clarification
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> José Arce
>
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/26 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff en atlarge.icann.org
> <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org>>
>
> Dear All,
>
> On behalf of Roberto Gaetano, Chair of the Board Candidate
> Evaluation Committee (BCEC), please find attached the Call for
> Expressions of Interest for the Board Director selected by
> At-Large (in English, French and Spanish).
>
> The document contains the link for the online application.
>
> Applications will be accepted between 26 November and 26
> December 2013 at 23:59 UTC.
>
> The Board Director occupying Seat 15 will join the ICANN Board
> at the conclusion of 2014 ICANN Annual General Meeting, in
> October 2014.
>
> Regards,
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber,
> Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in
> support of ALAC
> E-mail: staff en atlarge.icann.org
> <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org><mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org><mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org
> <mailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org>%3cmailto:staff en atlarge.icann.org
> <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff en atlarge.icann.org>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Arce, José F.
> http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Arce, José F.
> http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
>
>
>
>
> --
> Arce, José F.
> http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/517e1b6539.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es