Fwd: ICANN Alerta de Noticias - Actualización sobre Registrador enmiendas Acuerdo de Acreditación

salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com
Mie Sep 26 00:25:57 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Fwd: ICANN Alerta de Noticias - Actualización sobre Registrador enmiendas Acuerdo de Acreditación 
 De: salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com

 Queridos todos, 


 En primer lugar, muchas gracias Carlton. Tengo un par de preguntas, a saber: 




   1. La sesión fue grabada y hay transcripciones o audiopods? 
   2. ¿Quién representa la GNSO y ccNSO en esas reuniones? 
   3. Eran los expertos que realizan actualmente los 4 estudios de Whois presentes en 
   la reunión y que las discusiones afectar el alcance actual de su 
   Los estudios actuales? 
   4. ¿Quién de la OCDE, la CE estaba presente en esa reunión? 
   5. Que los representantes que asistieron Aplicación de la Ley y que haya incluido 
   Autoridades de ingresos y en qué países eran? 
   6. ¿Quién establece la agenda de las discusiones y fue esta disponible en la 
   Wiki o sitio web de ICANN? 
   7. ¿Cuál fue el resultado de los debates?


 Gracias y un cordial saludo, 
 Sala 




 En Wed, Sep 26 2012 a las 11:40 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com 
> wrote:
> So here we are.  What do we know? And, when did we know it?
>
> Under the label 'Current Situation and Recent Developments' in the  *RAA
> Negotiations Update* document, it says:
>
>  "six additional negotiating sessions, including two all-day in-person
> meetings held in Washington DC (one of which was attended by Governmental
> Advisory Committee members and representatives from the law enforcement
> representatives)...........the negotiations since Prague has largely
> focused on the key areas of Whois verification and data retention, which
> are part of 12 GAC/law enforcement recommendations."
>
> In case you missed the significance, there is further contextualization:
>
> "I
> n Prague, we highlighted four critical elements of the law enforcement
> recommendations:
> (1)verification / validation of Whois data;
> (2)enhanced collection of information related to registrants (data
> retention);
> (3)clarification of registrar responsibility regarding resellers and
> privacy/proxy services;
> and
> (4)creation of contacts for reports of domain name abuse.
>
> The ALAC and At-Large have certainly not been mute on said 'critical
> elements'. And while the ALAC is also on record demanding transparent
> negotiations if only because of the pivotal role the RAA plays in consensus
> policy development,  I personally do not have any the current information
> regarding At-Large/ALAC dispositions at these sessions.  All things being
> equal, it appears the At-Large [and the ALAC] were treated like unloved
> country cousins on your father's side, thrice removed.
>
> I'm pleased to hear negotiations have progressed in certain areas. See the
> Summary of Negotiations Status. Look closely at Item #10: Registrar
> Validation of Registrant Data. Apply the stoplight status here and
> contextualize what this means.
>
> I have attached both documents for ease of access.
>
> - Carlton Samuels
>   [Chair, At-Large WHOIS WG]
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ICANN News Alert <communications en icann.org>
> Date: Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:56 PM
> Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Update on Registrar Accreditation Agreement
> Amendments
> To: carlton.samuels en gmail.com
>
>
> **
>  [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-5-24sep12-en.htm
> ------------------------------
> Update on Registrar Accreditation Agreement Amendments
>
> 24 September 2012
>
> In advance of the ICANN meeting in Toronto, ICANN and the Registrars are
> posting two documents on the status of negotiations of amendments to the
> Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). Since Prague, significant progress
> has been made, though certain key issues remain open. There were six
> negotiation sessions, including a full day session with participants from
> the Governmental Advisory Committee and representatives of law enforcement.
> As reported earlier, there is agreement in many areas, including nearly all
> law enforcement recommendations. In the two remaining recommendations still
> under discussion, ICANN and the registrars are much closer to reaching a
> negotiated position on Whois verification and data retention.
>
> On Whois verification, a framework for improving Whois accuracy has been
> developed, however, ICANN and the registrars still have not reached
> agreement on the number of fields that are to be verified.
>
> On data retention, discussion among law enforcement representatives,
> registrars and ICANN indicates there is agreement in principle on a
> two-tiered retention schedule to account for differing data privacy
> obligations. More detail on each of these items, as well as status of
> negotiations on the other law enforcement requests, are provided in the
> documents posted today:
>
> *RAA Negotiation
> Update<
> http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/negotiations-update-24sep12-en.pdf
> >
> :* A memo providing detail on the negotiations since the Prague meeting and
> providing some questions for further community input.
>
> *Summary Chart of Status of
> Negotiations<
> http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/negotiations-status-summary-24sep12-en.pdf
> >
> :* Detailed status of negotiation on each of the 12 law enforcement
> requests, noting the remaining items remaining for discussion. Key requests
> from Registrars and ICANN for additional terms in the RAA are also
> identified at the end of the chart.
>
> Because the negotiations have been focused on these key areas, ICANN and
> the Registrars have not yet reached a fully negotiated agreement on all
> terms and provisions within the RAA. When available, a full draft will be
> posted for public comment. Until that time, ICANN and the Registrars
> welcome feedback on the discussion topics identified in the summary memo to
> help inform the community discussions in Toronto. Comments can be forwarded
> to the RAA Negotiations Status
> Wiki<
> https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Registrars+to+Amend+the+Registrar+Accreditation+Agreement
> >
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>








 Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro alias Sala 
 PO Box 17862 
 Suva 
 Fiji 


 Twitter: @ SalanietaT 
 Skype: Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro 
 Celular Fiji: +679 998 2851 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2e356ef0ec.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es