FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga

Lun Sep 10 22:55:33 UTC 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga 
 De: h.raiche en internode.on.net

 Gracias Carlton 

 El verdadero desafío no será el principio: cuando me sentaba en las discusiones del equipo Whois Review, hay una aceptación general de la necesidad de proteger a los grupos que pueden estar en riesgo en determinadas situaciones políticas. El reto es poner el principio generalmente aceptado en palabras - cómo describir los grupos de derechos humanos de una forma que identifica a los grupos / personas que estarán en riesgo mientras no dar la misma protección a los que se aprovecharía para propósitos nefastos (el trabajo del SSAC mostró un gran número de personas en malware / actividad criminal mediante el dispositivo de servidor de privacidad / proxy para ocultar su identidad.) Por lo que es un claro caso de que el diablo en los detalles. Y el otro desafío es definir quién tiene acceso a los detalles y en qué circunstancias. Una vez más - una cuestión muy controvertida. 

 Sí, es un problema real para ALAC - pero una vez que lleguemos allá principio, será un complejo conjunto de cuestiones

 Acebo 
 El 11/09/2012, a las 1:58 AM, Carlton Samuels escribió: 

> Hi Holly:
> Absolutely, the privacy issues you highlighted do attract spirited debate and very emotional responses.  The ALAC has staked out its position and at least for the last 3 years, that position has been consistently reiterated: a recognition that in furtherance of free speech rights, some groups, especially ones that might be politically inconvenient, do indeed deserve some protection;  a formal community embrace of defined privacy services and their providers; the conditions under which a privacy provider would be authorised.
> 
> Best,
> - Carlton
> 
>    
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche en internode.on.net> wrote:
> Hi Carlton
> 
> Privacy was one of the really hard issues that the Whois Review had to grapple with.  If you look at the initial report (as opposed to the Final and Final Final reports) two privacy issues are there. The first is how to determine registrant eligibility for the privacy server.  Should it be confined to individuals, or include organisations (clear candidates would be human rights groups in many countries, womens' refuges etc)  Trying to define eligibility will be a challenge.   The other challenge is to define who has legitimate access to the contact information held by the privacy server. 'Law enforcement agencies' was the initial thought.  But in some countries, private organisations also perform law enforcement tasks under contract to the agency.  They are performing legitimate law enforcement tasks but aren't themselves, agencies.  Should they have access.  Even more difficult are the countries where the state itself is the oppressor - and  its 'law enforcement' agencies!
> 
> I'm sure that is the reason the Final Final report backed away from any details on the proposal - and probably why discussion is being fostered now.
> 
> I suspect there will be many varied and divergent views within ALAC - all of them legitimate. Providing input on what is a complex, vexed issue will be a challenge for GAC - and for ALAC.
> 
> Holly
> 
> On 08/09/2012, at 12:46 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
> 
> > FYI.  Note the specific request for advice via GAC on data protection.
> > - Carlton
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > =============================
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz en icann.org>
> > Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:26 PM
> > Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since Prague
> > To: "soac-discussion en icann.org" <soac-discussion en icann.org>
> > Cc: Matt Serlin <matt.serlin en markmonitor.com>
> >
> >
> > Dear SO/AC Chairs,
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Recognizing the broad interest in the ICANN community on the RAA
> > negotiations,  we wanted to provide you with a brief update on the work
> > conducted since the Prague Meeting for you to share with your members.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Since Prague, the negotiation teams have reviewed the input received from
> > the Community in order to identify possible path forwards on the complex
> > issues that have been put on the table in these negotiations.  Several
> > meetings have taken place and are scheduled prior to Toronto, including
> > plans to invite the GAC to provide input from data protection experts on
> > several specific issues.  There is also an agreement among the negotiation
> > teams to begin analysis of a potential framework for a privacy/proxy
> > accreditation program to be explored with the broader ICANN community.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > For more information on these important negotiations, please visit the
> > ICANN wiki at:
> > https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Registrars+to+Amend+the+Registrar+Accreditation+Agreement
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Kurt Pritz (ICANN) and Matt Serlin (MarkMonitor)
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ** **
> > <smime.p7s>_______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> 
> 

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/82951c21fc.html
--]]