FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga

salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com
Lun Sep 10 19:48:06 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga 
 De: salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com

 También me gustaría añadir que las amenazas que acompañan al TPP da lugar a 
 lo que Holly se menciona en términos de "aplicación de la ley privada" donde marca IP 
 titulares, en virtud de preaviso directamente puede tener acceso. Esta es la razón 
 leyes deben ser debatidas por la gente en los parlamentos o legislativas 
 Asambleas. ¿Qué pasa con "Debido Proceso"? Lo que constituye un 
 incautación legal de un Nombre de Dominio? 


 El Martes, 11 sep 2012 a las 3:58 AM, Carlton Samuels 
<carlton.samuels en gmail.com> escribió: 


> Hi Holly:
> Absolutely, the privacy issues you highlighted do attract spirited debate
> and very emotional responses.  The ALAC has staked out its position and at
> least for the last 3 years, that position has been consistently reiterated:
> a recognition that in furtherance of free speech rights, some groups,
> especially ones that might be politically inconvenient, do indeed deserve
> some protection;  a formal community embrace of defined privacy services
> and their providers; the conditions under which a privacy provider would be
> authorised.
>
> Best,
> - Carlton
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche en internode.on.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Carlton
> >
> > Privacy was one of the really hard issues that the Whois Review had to
> > grapple with.  If you look at the initial report (as opposed to the Final
> > and Final Final reports) two privacy issues are there. The first is how
> to
> > determine registrant eligibility for the privacy server.  Should it be
> > confined to individuals, or include organisations (clear candidates would
> > be human rights groups in many countries, womens' refuges etc)  Trying to
> > define eligibility will be a challenge.   The other challenge is to
> define
> > who has legitimate access to the contact information held by the privacy
> > server. 'Law enforcement agencies' was the initial thought.  But in some
> > countries, private organisations also perform law enforcement tasks under
> > contract to the agency.  They are performing legitimate law enforcement
> > tasks but aren't themselves, agencies.  Should they have access.  Even
> more
> > difficult are the countries where the state itself is the oppressor - and
> >  its 'law enforcement' agencies are the very reason for the need for
> > privacy.
> >
> > I'm sure that is the reason the Final Final report backed away from any
> > details on the proposal - and probably why discussion is being fostered
> now.
> >
> > I suspect there will be many varied and divergent views within ALAC - all
> > of them legitimate. Providing input on what is a complex, vexed issue
> will
> > be a challenge for GAC - and for ALAC.
> >
> > Holly
> >
> > On 08/09/2012, at 12:46 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
> >
> > > FYI.  Note the specific request for advice via GAC on data protection.
> > > - Carlton
> > >
> > > ==============================
> > > Carlton A Samuels
> > > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > > =============================
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz en icann.org>
> > > Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:26 PM
> > > Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since
> > Prague
> > > To: "soac-discussion en icann.org" <soac-discussion en icann.org>
> > > Cc: Matt Serlin <matt.serlin en markmonitor.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear SO/AC Chairs,
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > Recognizing the broad interest in the ICANN community on the RAA
> > > negotiations,  we wanted to provide you with a brief update on the work
> > > conducted since the Prague Meeting for you to share with your members.
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > Since Prague, the negotiation teams have reviewed the input received
> from
> > > the Community in order to identify possible path forwards on the
> complex
> > > issues that have been put on the table in these negotiations.  Several
> > > meetings have taken place and are scheduled prior to Toronto, including
> > > plans to invite the GAC to provide input from data protection experts
> on
> > > several specific issues.  There is also an agreement among the
> > negotiation
> > > teams to begin analysis of a potential framework for a privacy/proxy
> > > accreditation program to be explored with the broader ICANN community.
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > For more information on these important negotiations, please visit the
> > > ICANN wiki at:
> > >
> >
> https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Registrars+to+Amend+the+Registrar+Accreditation+Agreement
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > Kurt Pritz (ICANN) and Matt Serlin (MarkMonitor)
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > ****
> > >
> > > ** **
> > > <smime.p7s>_______________________________________________
> > > At-Large mailing list
> > > At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> > >
> > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>






 Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro alias Sala 
 PO Box 17862 
 Suva 
 Fiji 


 Twitter: @ SalanietaT 
 Skype: Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro 
 Celular Fiji: +679 998 2851 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8ab4b75018.html
--]]




Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es