nominación LACRALO renuncia como representante de ALAC

[carlton.samuels en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: nominación LACRALO renuncia como representante de ALAC 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 Querido Fátima: 
 Me siento muy triste por la decisión que ha tomado, pero entiendo totalmente 
 y empatizar con el camino que llevó a la decisión. Sepa que usted 
 siguen aumentando en mi opinión como colega y como participante de 
 el tipo de LACRALO yo imaginada cuando llegué a esto en 2006. 


 Mis mejores deseos. 
 - Carlton 


 ============================== 
 Carlton Samuels A 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * 
 ============================= 




 El Miércoles, 22 de agosto 2012 a las 10:17 PM, <fatimacambronero en gmail.com> escribió: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Waiver LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC
>  From: fatimacambronero en gmail.com
>
>  Dear members of LACRALO,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  I am communicating with you in view of the last events
>  occurred in our RALO to inform the decision that I have taken.
>
>
>
>
>  SABRN As delegates of ALS have received their credentials for
>  vote and make a decision as a region. We must rule on whether the
>  cuestin candidate meets the requirement of Rule 8 of our
>  Operating Principles, specifically requiring the principal residence
>  in one of the countries of the region.
>
>
>
>
>  According to the view favored our list sent by discusin
>  LACRALO President and According the many arguments jurdicos
>  presented in this post, basndonos in our Operating Principles
>  LACRALO in the ICANN Bylaws, the laws of the State of
>  California (and reinforced with additional sharee'ah), is my
>  understanding that the rules are clear, both in terms of requiring
>  residence in one of our countries of the region, and in addition on
> qutbNL&gt; is meant by the concept residence, a separate and distinct
> concept
>  the concept of domicile.
>
>
>
>
>  I am convinced that the rules estn to accomplish. And msan when, with
>  jurdicos the number of arguments presented, the rules are clear.
>
>
>
>
>  Vote in this case implies that if we all agree (or the majority),
>  we will decide what specifically requests violate one of our rules
>  LACRALO.
>
>
>
>
>  Taking the work of analyzing and respect our rules and present
>  presentnuestro arguments LACRALO President, is a task very
>  few were taken and that many of the answers to that email were
>  full of disrespect and unsubstantiated opinions, with no
>  jurdicos arguments, which is what should be analyzed in this case.
>
>
>
>
>  I would like to fully understand this: I will always defend the right to
>  region to rule and decide how issues that affect us as such.
>  I worked and I will continue to reach consensus on our
>  region, as it is not possible to decide for most of us. That
>  s, subject to compliance with our operating principles, our MoU
>  with ICANN and the ICANN Bylaws.
>
>
>
>
>  In the situation we are living in LACRALO, this is not the case.
>
>
>
>
>  We are voting to decide to break the rules.
>
>
>
>
>  As you all know my formation is a lawyer, and I made a vow:
>  respect and enforce the laws (rules, rules, regulations).
>
>
>  Therefore, to remain part of this election process, when going
>  against my profession, my oath and my principles, is to go
>  against my essence.
>
>
>
>
>  As I have indicated those who were part of the redaccin
>  our Operating Principles, the residence requirement (such as
>  nationality of representatives) is by demanding our Principles
>  Operating RALO to prevent capture by one organizacino by
>  a group of organizations. Unfortunately it was achieved.
>
>
>
>
>  A RALO estcapturado not, working in a healthy harmony, is a RALO
>  where delegates from organizations that are offered for groups
>  Work, then participate in its conference and decisions
>  taken by the Working Group, which is the official RALO Assembly
>  General undertook to deliver his report to the AG, then delivers
>  without being asked by anyone, is a RALO where officers
>  respect the tasks and functions assigned, consultndolo
>  Officials with the others previously, is a RALO where our
>  representatives discussed Policies, we as members are going
>  delivering, after they are discussed as a region.
>
>
>
>
>  It is regrettable that in our RALO, when you can not destroy
>  positions with arguments, are destroyed by the force of the faults of
>  respect, private pressures of unsubstantiated opinions.
>
>
>
>
>  Lords, donkey can work or get results. We are like a
>  bucket full of crabs where to want and stick his head up ms
>  high head stepped on each other and in the end nobody leaves that
>  bucket.
>
>
>
>
>  This is not the LACRALO that I imagin.
>
>
>
>
>  For the reasons expressed, primarily on the grounds that
>  estn this case violated express and clear rules requiring
>  LACRALO our Operating Principles, * I decided to quit my
>  LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC. *
>
>
>
>
>  Also take the opportunity to inform and notify my
>  silence and lack of activity in the next few das, because I will be
>  subjected to quirrgica intervencin I will keep off.
>
>
>
>
>  Best regards,
>
>
>  Fatima Cambronero
>
>
>
>
>  -
>  * Fatima Cambronero *
>  Attorney-Argentina
>
>
>  Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
>  Twitter: @ facambronero
>  Skype: fatima.cambronero
>
>
>  * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: *
>  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
>
>  * Join the discussions Diplo Internet Governance Community: *
>  http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/
>
>
>  * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/00f30d9fd1.html
--]]