¿Podría CISPA Sé el siguiente SOPA?

[carlton.samuels en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: ¿Podría CISPA Sé el siguiente SOPA? 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 Hola Raquel: 
 Usted coloca una perspectivas interesantes en el debate, gracias por eso. 


 Aparte de eso, parece que pueden haber interpretado mi respuesta como una 
 aprobación de CISPA / SOPA y / o regímenes como el. Para mí, para opinar que lo que 
 la ley tiene la intención CISPA ya se está haciendo no es así y no se pueden tomar 
 como un respaldo. 


 Por lo que vale, mi posición en estos asuntos es reflejo libertario. Pero, 
 dispuestos a aceptar mejoras modestas en la razón y de la política pública amplia 
 efecto. 


 Mejor, 
 - Carlton 


 ============================== 
 Carlton Samuels A 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * 
 ============================= 




 El mar, 10 de abril 2012 a las 7:08 PM, Raquel Gatto <raquel.gatto en gmail.com> escribió: 


> Hi Carlton,
>
> I agree that we should have a coherent argument, in public or private
> regimes, for what we want to keep in privacy ranges/records.
>
> But having it codified the wrong way (which in my opinion is exactly the
> problem of SOPA/CISPA and others) is what will weak the users voice to
> protect their personal data and privacy.
>
> We are talking about two different regimes: (i) one is public regime which
> is due to government. they have limits to act, especially to keep the
> accountability to the legitimate sovereigns - the citizens. Of course we
> are not in the perfect world and sometimes it is not the way things work.
> But it doesn`t mean it shouldn`t and we shouldn`t keep an eye on it, even
> if it is to be against taking my/our privacy in name of cyber intelligence
> management ;) and (ii) we have the other regime which is a private one. It
> is limited by some consumer and privacy regulation that change from place
> to place, but in the end we are talking about a choice from a client. So
> they have the market bounding and electing their choices to keep them on
> the right track.
>
> My 2 cents...
>
> []s Raquel
>
>
> 2012/4/10 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks, Juan Manuel for sharing.  In my view, this essentially only
>> codifies and bring out to the open what has been standard practice
>> forever.
>>
>>
>> The fact is most technologies begin with an intensely security/military
>> focus and then seeps into the commercial world. It has always seem odd to
>> me that most of us tend to accept that Microsoft and Google can do it but,
>> somehow, not the government. At least not without our prior knowledge.
>>  Especially when government [collectively] is possibly the single largest
>> buyer of ICTs.
>>
>> - Carlton
>>
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>>
>> =============================
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Juan Manuel <jumaropi en yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I only want to share you this article
>> >
>> > Could CISPA Be the Next SOPA?
>> > MASHABLE! | 8 DE ABRIL DE 2555 BE
>> > http://pulse.me/s/7X00y
>> >
>> >
>> > A bill introduced to the House of Representatives late last year could
>> > become the centerpiece of the next SOPA-style struggle between the tech
>> > commun... Read more
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent via Pulse
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> > lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/86dd11d6d7.html
--]]