FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga

Lun Sep 10 02:09:47 UTC 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga 
 De: salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro en gmail.com

 El lunes, 10 de septiembre 2012 a las 1:47 PM, acebo Raiche <h.raiche en internode.on.net> escribió: 


> Hi Carlton
>
> Privacy was one of the really hard issues that the Whois Review had to
> grapple with.  If you look at the initial report (as opposed to the Final
> and Final Final reports) two privacy issues are there. The first is how to
> determine registrant eligibility for the privacy server.  Should it be
> confined to individuals, or include organisations (clear candidates would
> be human rights groups in many countries, womens' refuges etc)  Trying to
> define eligibility will be a challenge.   The other challenge is to define
> who has legitimate access to the contact information held by the privacy
> server. 'Law enforcement agencies' was the initial thought.  But in some
> countries, private organisations also perform law enforcement tasks under
> contract to the agency.  They are performing legitimate law enforcement
> tasks but aren't themselves, agencies.  Should they have access.  Even more
> difficult are the countries where the state itself is the oppressor - and
>  its 'law enforcement' agencies a!
>  re the very reason for the need for privacy.
>


 el proxy Whois y el Estudio de privacidad y proxy Whois Relé y Privacidad 
 Revela estudio que se informó a la comunidad mundial a la conclusión en 2012 
 pero no ha habido un cambio en la que el resultado de este estudio se 
 entregado, que es ahora de 2013, se desprende que el proceso de la política o PDP 
 sin duda, tienen que tener los resultados en la mezcla. Sin embargo, esto no es 
 decir que las discusiones deberían esperar los resultados de los estudios, creo que 
 un poco de trabajo se debe hacer ahora y un buen punto de partida posible para crear un 
 referencia temporal modelada en torno a las conclusiones del Consejo Europeo de 
 Nacional de Registros de TLD. 
 > 
> I'm sure that is the reason the Final Final report backed away from any
> details on the proposal - and probably why discussion is being fostered now.
>
> I suspect there will be many varied and divergent views within ALAC - all
> of them legitimate. Providing input on what is a complex, vexed issue will
> be a challenge for GAC - and for ALAC.
>
> Holly
>
> On 08/09/2012, at 12:46 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>
> > FYI.  Note the specific request for advice via GAC on data protection.
> > - Carlton
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > =============================
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz en icann.org>
> > Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:26 PM
> > Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since
> Prague
> > To: "soac-discussion en icann.org" <soac-discussion en icann.org>
> > Cc: Matt Serlin <matt.serlin en markmonitor.com>
> >
> >
> > Dear SO/AC Chairs,
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Recognizing the broad interest in the ICANN community on the RAA
> > negotiations,  we wanted to provide you with a brief update on the work
> > conducted since the Prague Meeting for you to share with your members.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Since Prague, the negotiation teams have reviewed the input received from
> > the Community in order to identify possible path forwards on the complex
> > issues that have been put on the table in these negotiations.  Several
> > meetings have taken place and are scheduled prior to Toronto, including
> > plans to invite the GAC to provide input from data protection experts on
> > several specific issues.  There is also an agreement among the
> negotiation
> > teams to begin analysis of a potential framework for a privacy/proxy
> > accreditation program to be explored with the broader ICANN community.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > For more information on these important negotiations, please visit the
> > ICANN wiki at:
> >
> https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Registrars+to+Amend+the+Registrar+Accreditation+Agreement
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Kurt Pritz (ICANN) and Matt Serlin (MarkMonitor)
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ** **
> > <smime.p7s>_______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>


 Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro alias Sala 
 PO Box 17862 
 Suva 
 Fiji


 Twitter: @ SalanietaT 
 Skype: Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro 
 Celular Fiji: +679 998 2851 
 _______________________________________________ 


[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d4e1e33778.html
--]]