Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2)

cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com
Vie Ago 17 15:31:08 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2) 
 De: cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com

 Así que dejemos de patear a un lado a otro. 


 José por este correo electrónico que considere su posición basada en la opinión personal de la ICANN y sobre la base de la división de opiniones ... solicitud de que usted y nuestra secretaria iniciar una votación sobre la inclusión o eliminación del candidato. 


 Saludos 
 Cintra 
 Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry disponible desde bmobile. 


 ----- Mensaje original ----- 
 De: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
 Remitente: lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Date: Fri, 17 de agosto 2012 08:29:39 
 Para: Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb>
 Cc: <lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Examen Final - Miembro de ALAC 
 Elecciones (Parte 2) 


 República de Corea, 
 Si sigo tu razonamiento, nadie tiene la responsabilidad de ver la retinopatía del prematuro es 
 obedecido. 


 Y en el caso de una violación, todo el mundo tiene el deber de sentarse en sus manos. 


 No mi hermano, alguien debe hacer la llamada.Ese es un papel para el 
 presidir oficial. 


 Y si no está de acuerdo en la llamada, tenemos una manera de resolver ese desacuerdo. 


 Convocatoria de una división y recuento de los votos. 


 - Carlton 


 ============================== 
 Carlton Samuels A 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * 
 ============================= 




 El Jue, 16 de agosto 2012 a las 11:09 PM, Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb> escribió: 


>   Carlton,
>
> My understanding of a petition is that you have a grievance. Then you have
> to get a certain amount of members to agree to back the petition before it
> becomes valid. This depends on so many factors that for a chair to make a
> decision that requires members to petition should be a decision of a
> serious nature and not one so simplistic and obvious that does not even
> require a decision by the Chair. The Chair is sticking his neck out and I
> am not going to validate executive authority where it does not exist.
>
> ROK
>
>  *From:* Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2012 11:49 PM
> *To:* Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb>
> *Cc:* Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com> ;
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] Final Consideration - Member of ALAC
> Election(Part 2)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb> wrote:
>
>> the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.
>>
>
> We do not accept our Chair as if he was the Bishop of Rome; infallible in
> all things.
>
> As the presiding officer, the Chair's principal role is to interpret rules
> but not 'carte blanche'.  He is constrained by the RoP in the first
> instance.
>
> Here's the good thing. Every other member also has an unfettered right to
> interpret said rules.
>
> And since for our purposes, the Chair is and must be a member in ordinary,
> every other member has the right to challenge  any and every interpretation
> of the Chair.
>
> Here's the kicker.  Every member retains the absolute right to petition
> every other member to your point of view.  We call that a vote.
>
> I say again, if you fell aggrieved by the declaration, then there is a
> remedy.  Exercise it if you must.
>
> - CAS
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5204 - Release Date: 08/16/12
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/997b9dd904.html
--]]





Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es