Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2)

[carlton.samuels en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2) 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 República de Corea, 
 Si sigo tu razonamiento, nadie tiene la responsabilidad de ver la retinopatía del prematuro es 
 obedecido. 


 Y en el caso de una violación, todo el mundo tiene el deber de sentarse en sus manos. 


 No mi hermano, alguien debe hacer la llamada. Ese es un papel para el 
 presidir oficial. 


 Y si no está de acuerdo en la llamada, tenemos una manera de resolver ese desacuerdo. 


 Convocatoria de una división y recuento de los votos. 


 - Carlton 


 ============================== 
 Carlton Samuels A 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * 
 ============================= 




 El Jue, 16 de agosto 2012 a las 11:09 PM, Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb> escribió: 


>   Carlton,
>
> My understanding of a petition is that you have a grievance. Then you have
> to get a certain amount of members to agree to back the petition before it
> becomes valid. This depends on so many factors that for a chair to make a
> decision that requires members to petition should be a decision of a
> serious nature and not one so simplistic and obvious that does not even
> require a decision by the Chair. The Chair is sticking his neck out and I
> am not going to validate executive authority where it does not exist.
>
> ROK
>
>  *From:* Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2012 11:49 PM
> *To:* Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb>
> *Cc:* Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com> ;
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] Final Consideration - Member of ALAC
> Election(Part 2)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok en bango.org.bb> wrote:
>
>> the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.
>>
>
> We do not accept our Chair as if he was the Bishop of Rome; infallible in
> all things.
>
> As the presiding officer, the Chair's principal role is to interpret rules
> but not 'carte blanche'.  He is constrained by the RoP in the first
> instance.
>
> Here's the good thing. Every other member also has an unfettered right to
> interpret said rules.
>
> And since for our purposes, the Chair is and must be a member in ordinary,
> every other member has the right to challenge  any and every interpretation
> of the Chair.
>
> Here's the kicker.  Every member retains the absolute right to petition
> every other member to your point of view.  We call that a vote.
>
> I say again, if you fell aggrieved by the declaration, then there is a
> remedy.  Exercise it if you must.
>
> - CAS
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5204 - Release Date: 08/16/12
>
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/59da82705e.html
--]]