Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante

[jam en jacquelinemorris.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante 
 A partir de: jam at jacquelinemorris.com

 Carlton - Estoy totalmente de acuerdo. La gente está renunciando a sus conocimientos, 
 esfuerzo y el tiempo de trabajo productivo ($ $) y el tiempo personal y familiar a 
 entregar el producto del conocimiento gratis para ICANN. Es ofensivo para considerar 
 "Sanciones" en ellos. 
 Jacqueline A. Morris 
 La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: ubicua, necesaria, Invisible y 
 Libre. (AfterChris Lehmann) 






 El Mar, 11 de octubre 2011 a las 9:49 AM, Carlton Samuels 
<carlton.samuels at gmail.com> escribió: 
> As I have already stated, I cannot vote for any report that recommends
> "sanctions" on volunteers, even if they are yet to be determined.  The state
> of mind that delivers this gem can only be repudiated for cause.
>
> There is a dangerous flirting with principle and even so, I was willing to
> hold my nose and vote for a report that equates travel support required to
> execute a voluntary mission as a "gift" that can be withheld by ICANN, the
> corporation!
>
> It doesn't require any deep introspection to see how this posture devalues
> the time, effort, the knowledge products and yes, even funds that volunteers
> gift to this thing of ours, this names and numbers policy development
> complex.
>
> So here it is. Within the framework that we operate, I can sometimes
> overlook people being wrong headed.  But I am unanimous the whole concept of
> "sanctions" for a volunteer engaged in a voluntary effort really is
> offensive to reason.
>
> I personally cannot stomach too many of those. This one is rejected.  I
> shall vote NO.
>
> Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>wrote:
>
>> Dear ALAC ExCom members,
>>
>> I want to inform you of some changes to the Improvements report based on
>> information Heidi and Seth received from Samantha Eisner of ICANN Legal.
>> Legal's view is that the only "final report" appropriate for Board
>> approval would come once the ALAC can report having implemented *all*
>> the recommendations of the ALAC Review WG.
>>
>> At this stage, however, we could report that the ALAC has completed a
>> substantial amount of ALAC Improvements work, including developing
>> specific proposals for the implementation of the ALAC Review WG
>> recommendations. Consequently, Sam suggests the current status report –
>> which need only be submitted by staff (not by the ALAC) – not be called
>> a “final report”’; we are thinking of calling it the "ALAC/At-Large
>> Improvements Project Milestone Report."
>>
>> Still, an endorsement of this Milestone Report by the ALAC would send a
>> strong message to the Board. So I have instructed Staff to start a vote
>> endorsing the report on Sunday.
>>
>> The next steps in the At-Large Improvements Project will be for the ALAC
>> to discuss the implementation of the remaining ALAC Review
>> recommendations and WT proposals in Dakar, including allocating them to
>> existing At-Large Working Groups, creating timelines for their
>> completion, and determining potential resource implications.
>>
>> I would like to be able to submit these details to the Board as soon as
>> practical but hopefully no later than the meeting in Costa Rica (11-16
>> March 2012). The ALAC could then aim to submit the actual final Final
>> Report -- marking the completion of the implementation of all
>> Improvements recommendations -- to the Board in Prague (24-28 June 2012).
>>
>> Would you kindly let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible?
>> Seth and others are working to convert the report into a "Milestone"
>> report as we speak.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Olivier Crépin-Leblond
>> ALAC Chair
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC-ExCom mailing list
>> ALAC-ExCom at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom
>>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>





[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1354bbc545.html
--]]