Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante

Mar Oct 11 13:57:52 UTC 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante 
 A partir de: carlosaguirre62 en hotmail.com

 Bueno, dijo Carlton! Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted. Pero también reconozco que es un tema difícil en algunos casos y, a veces. 
 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre 
 NCA Consejo de la GNSO - ICANN 
 el ex miembro de ALAC por LACRALO 
 Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios 
 Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - 
 * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 
 http://ar.ageiadensi.org 

> From: carlton.samuels en gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:49:25 -0500
> To: ocl en gih.com
> CC: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac-excom en atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] [ALAC-ExCom] ALAC/At-Large Improvements	Project -- important update
> 
> As I have already stated, I cannot vote for any report that recommends
> "sanctions" on volunteers, even if they are yet to be determined.  The state
> of mind that delivers this gem can only be repudiated for cause.
> 
> There is a dangerous flirting with principle and even so, I was willing to
> hold my nose and vote for a report that equates travel support required to
> execute a voluntary mission as a "gift" that can be withheld by ICANN, the
> corporation!
> 
> It doesn't require any deep introspection to see how this posture devalues
> the time, effort, the knowledge products and yes, even funds that volunteers
> gift to this thing of ours, this names and numbers policy development
> complex.
> 
> So here it is. Within the framework that we operate, I can sometimes
> overlook people being wrong headed.  But I am unanimous the whole concept of
> "sanctions" for a volunteer engaged in a voluntary effort really is
> offensive to reason.
> 
> I personally cannot stomach too many of those. This one is rejected.  I
> shall vote NO.
> 
> Carlton
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl en gih.com>wrote:
> 
> > Dear ALAC ExCom members,
> >
> > I want to inform you of some changes to the Improvements report based on
> > information Heidi and Seth received from Samantha Eisner of ICANN Legal.
> > Legal's view is that the only "final report" appropriate for Board
> > approval would come once the ALAC can report having implemented *all*
> > the recommendations of the ALAC Review WG.
> >
> > At this stage, however, we could report that the ALAC has completed a
> > substantial amount of ALAC Improvements work, including developing
> > specific proposals for the implementation of the ALAC Review WG
> > recommendations. Consequently, Sam suggests the current status report –
> > which need only be submitted by staff (not by the ALAC) – not be called
> > a “final report”’; we are thinking of calling it the "ALAC/At-Large
> > Improvements Project Milestone Report."
> >
> > Still, an endorsement of this Milestone Report by the ALAC would send a
> > strong message to the Board. So I have instructed Staff to start a vote
> > endorsing the report on Sunday.
> >
> > The next steps in the At-Large Improvements Project will be for the ALAC
> > to discuss the implementation of the remaining ALAC Review
> > recommendations and WT proposals in Dakar, including allocating them to
> > existing At-Large Working Groups, creating timelines for their
> > completion, and determining potential resource implications.
> >
> > I would like to be able to submit these details to the Board as soon as
> > practical but hopefully no later than the meeting in Costa Rica (11-16
> > March 2012). The ALAC could then aim to submit the actual final Final
> > Report -- marking the completion of the implementation of all
> > Improvements recommendations -- to the Board in Prague (24-28 June 2012).
> >
> > Would you kindly let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible?
> > Seth and others are working to convert the report into a "Milestone"
> > report as we speak.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Olivier Crépin-Leblond
> > ALAC Chair
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC-ExCom mailing list
> > ALAC-ExCom en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom
> >
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e89e25478b.html
--]]