[lac-discuss-es] LACRALO y Elecciones

[carlosaguirre62 en hotmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: LACRALO y Elecciones 
 A partir de: carlosaguirre62 en hotmail.com





 Querida Jacqueline: Veo que le gusta pelear. Yo particularmente prefiero antes de que llegue, hablar mucho hasta llegar a una conclusión unificada. Creo que mis palabras fueron muy claras. Si nadie aparece en el momento adecuado, perdió la posibilidad de discutir después de los hechos consumados. Después del período de postulación, sólo un candidato. Por lo tanto, eso significa: un acuerdo enorme silencio, o un acuerdo por consenso teórico. 
 Nosotros no necesitamos extender más esta discusión, ahora se convirtió en abstracto. Todo lo mejor x u. 
 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre 
 NCA Consejo de la GNSO - ICANN 
 ex miembro de ALAC por LACRALO 
 Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios 
 Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - 
 * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 
 http://ar.ageiadensi.org 




> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:36:57 -0400
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
> From: jam en jacquelinemorris.com
> To: carlosaguirre62 en hotmail.com
> CC: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> Consensus without a quorum? That is really uncommon common sense. I
> grew up knowing that if there is no quorum, there is no activity that
> is official coming from that non-quorate "meeting". Therefore, how can
> there be consensus if there wasn't a quorate meeting? A connsensus of
> 4? when quorum is double that?
> Besides, I didn't see a call for a VOTE, I saw an online POLL to
> confirm the consensus. (Similar as counting hands in a room, or having
> the members in f2f say AYE or NO. (Which brings us to acclamation)
> Maybe there's a problem with the translation because poll and vote are
> two very different things in English.
> 
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, carlos dionisio aguirre
> <carlosaguirre62 en hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Jacqueline. The consensus was the silence. The no other candidate proposal. The lack of oposition. And as Jose said is really a stupid thing call to vote one candidate. My two cents. And common sense please.
> > Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:35:12
> > To: <lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
> >
> > Jose
> >  We have one candidate with approval from 4 of 36 ALSes, I don't see
> >  how 1/9th can be consensus. I'd think that if I were the candidate in
> >  this position, I'd like ALL the ALSes that support me to so say, and
> >  hence I am both officially and ethically approved. 4 out of 36 is kind
> >  of a big minority, not so?
> >  Just my $0.03.
> >
> >  Jacqueline A. Morris
> >  Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> >  Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
> >
> >





[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bf1006cf24.html
--]]