[lac-discuss-es] El Tribunal Europeo de Justicia sobre filtrado de Internet
carlton.samuels en gmail.com
carlton.samuels en gmail.com
Lun Nov 28 20:17:49 UTC 2011
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: El Tribunal Europeo de Justicia sobre filtrado de Internet
A partir de: carlton.samuels en gmail.com
Esta decisión es sin duda un alivio, porque el Tribunal está de acuerdo en que la
la presunción a la privacidad en Internet no puede ser tan fácilmente negada
o invadido.
La sentencia rechaza el "todo el mundo es un criminal" enfoque y recomendar que
Los titulares de PI alegando una lesión debe identificar la fuente individual y luego
perseguir su reparación legal de la queja en contra de esa entidad.
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Móvil: 876-818-1799
* Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega *
=============================
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 a las 7:00 AM, <
lac-discuss-en-request en atlarge-lists.icann.org> escribió:
> Send lac-discuss-en mailing list submissions to
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> lac-discuss-en-request en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> lac-discuss-en-owner en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lac-discuss-en digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. ENC: The European Court of Justice found that preemptive
> internet filtering violated the fundamental rights of the ISP
> and
> its customers. (Vanda UOL)
> 2. ENC: The European Court of Justice found internet filtering
> preemptive That Violated the fundamental rights of the ISP and
> Its customers. (vanda en uol.com.br)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:06:39 -0200
> From: "Vanda UOL" <vanda en uol.com.br>
> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] ENC: The European Court of Justice found
> that preemptive internet filtering violated the fundamental
> rights of
> the ISP and its customers.
> To: <lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>,
> <lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Message-ID: <001101ccad37$b480d3d0$1d827b70$@uol.com.br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>
> For believers in a free and open Internet, yesterday brought an
> extraordinarily significant reason to give thanks: The European Union's
> highest court -- the European Court of Justice -- ruled that Internet
> filtering is a violation of fundamental rights. The ECJ reversed a horribly
> misguided Belgian court decision that mandated China-style user
> surveillance
> by ISPs. This is a dramatically consequential decision that establishes a
> new baseline for Internet freedom that now protects the nearly 500 million
> individuals who live in the member states of the EU.
>
>
> <
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/european-high-court-rejects
>
> -internet-traffic-filtering-as-violation-of-fundamental-rights.ars?utm_sourc
>
> e=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars
> +Technica+-+Featured+Content%29<http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/european-high-court-rejects-internet-traffic-filtering-as-violation-of-fundamental-rights.ars?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars+Technica+-+Featured+Content%29>>
> Descri??o:
>
> https://s-external.ak.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQCB1W3SAjA-XG5-&w=90&h=90&
>
> url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.arstechnica.net%2Fbrief_icons_new%2Ftech-policy-brie
> f.png<https://s-external.ak.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQCB1W3SAjA-XG5-&w=90&h=90&url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.arstechnica.net%2Fbrief_icons_new%2Ftech-policy-brief.png>
>
>
> <
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/european-high-court-rejects
>
> -internet-traffic-filtering-as-violation-of-fundamental-rights.ars?utm_sourc
>
> e=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars
> +Technica+-+Featured+Content%29<http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/european-high-court-rejects-internet-traffic-filtering-as-violation-of-fundamental-rights.ars?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars+Technica+-+Featured+Content%29>>
> European high court rejects Internet
> traffic filtering as violation of fundamental rights
>
> arstechnica.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Vanda Scartezini
>
> Polo Consultores Associados
>
> IT Trend
>
> Alameda Santos 1470 ? 1407,8
>
> 01418-903 S?o Paulo,SP, Brasil
>
> Tel + 5511 3266.6253
>
> Mob + 55118181.1464
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:07:41 GMT
> From: vanda en uol.com.br
> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] ENC: The European Court of Justice found
> internet filtering preemptive That Violated the fundamental
> rights of
> the ISP and Its customers.
> To: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Message-ID: <201111271907.pARJ7fuS000902 en mm.icann.org>
>
>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
> Subject: ENC: The European Court of Justice found internet filtering
> preemptive That Violated the fundamental rights of the ISP and Its
> customers.
> From: vanda en uol.com.br
>
>
>
>
>
> For believers in a free and open Internet, an Brought yesterday
> Extraordinarily significant reason to give thanks: The European
> Union's
> Highest court - the European Court of Justice - ruled That Internet
> filtering is a violation of fundamental rights. The ECJ reversed a
> horribly
> That misguided Belgian court decision mandated surveillance China-style
> user
> by ISPs. This is a consequential decision That Dramatically establisher to
> new baseline for Internet freedom now That Protects Nearly 500 million the
> Individuals Who Live in the member states of the EU.
>
>
>
>
> <
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/european-high-court-rejects
> -Internet-traffic-filtering-as-violation-of-key-rights.ars? Utm_source
> e = feedburner & utm_medium = feed & utm_campaign = Feed% 3A + +%
> ArsTechnica% 28Ars 2Findex
> + Technica + - + Featured + Content% 29> \u200b\u200bDescri:
>
> https://s-external.ak.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQCB1W3SAjA-XG5-&w=90&h=90&
> url = http% 3A% 2F% 2Fstatic.arstechnica.net% 2Fbrief_icons_new%
> 2Ftech-policy-brie
> f.png
>
>
>
>
> <
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/european-high-court-rejects
> -Internet-traffic-filtering-as-violation-of-key-rights.ars? Utm_source
> e = feedburner & utm_medium = feed & utm_campaign = Feed% 3A + +%
> ArsTechnica% 28Ars 2Findex
> + Technica + - + Featured + Content% 29> \u200b\u200bEuropean high
> court rejects Internet
> filtering traffic violation of fundamental rights as
>
>
> arstechnica.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vanda Scartezini
>
>
> Polo Consultores Associados
>
>
> IT Trend
>
>
> Alameda Santos 1470 1407.8
>
>
> 01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil
>
>
> Tel + 5511 3266.6253
>
>
> Mob + 55118181.1464
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f66c888bba.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es