[lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] candidates to board Icann

[Jacqueline Morris]

Thanks Alex
Excellent criteria
I would also like to add to the criteria of being able to "represent" the
At-Large/LACRALO community (really impossible for one person as it is so
diverse, so I appreciated your inclusion of "sensitivity") - to be able to
"work" with the RALOs to develop competencies to improve knowledge of the
issues and hence participation in a TIMELY manner in the ICANN policy
processes - necessary for bottom up, multi-stakeholder, participatory
systems.

Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free.
(after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )



On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:44 PM, <apisan en servidor.unam.mx> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: candidates to board Icann
> From: apisan en servidor.unam.mx
>
> Carlos,
>
> since we continued summoning to discuss merits of candidates and that no
> he begins (neither I believe that he is going to begin, nor create to begin
> it I, for the reasons
> that I already expressed), we begin to discuss what merits QUICKLY
> we considered important, to describe them.
>
> Nor our representatives who are going to vote nor our coordinators
> they have done.
>
> I believe that he is right to request to those who am going to vote that
> they express his to us
> points of view, at the moment without giving to names but criteria.
>
> And that we can begin with a listing of criteria constructed from
> base. In order to initiate that discussion I propose to consider:
>
> 1. Predicting of effectiveness in the Board. Here the success would
> beincluded in
> tasks related to ICANN that require ample consultations,
> detailed knowledge, and the production of decisions or at least of
> supports for the same ones. Also they concern many knowledge of all
> aspects of ICANN, academic formation, rationality, hold for
> complex discussions, endurance, high threshold for
> frustration, vision of long term, capacity to maintain well
> administered its work, availability for the actual meetings and
> by teleconferencing at an inconvenient time, support of its institution.
>
> 2. Predicting of representativeness or sensitivity to the principles and
> necessities of community AT Large. Here principles would be included of
> participation, democratic conduct, decision making of down towards
> it arrives; file in subjects of defense of rights of the consumer, rights
> civilians, technical rationality, etc.
>
> 3. Predicting of representation of the Latin American community and of
> The Caribbean. Here they would include competition in the languages
> Spanish, Portuguese,
> and those of the Caribbean; experiences in works with the community that
> the own one
> community considers positive; it is present at or contact withorganizations
> and
> people of the region; performance in meetings that already have happened in
> region.
>
> 4. Predicting of a sustainable and predictable conduct. In addition to
> characteristics of paragraph 1, personal stability, to have more vision
> than ambition,
> absence of as much economic conflicts of interest as politicians, etc.
>
> it sounds well? Each one of You thinks that it could contribute elements
> stops
> to describe the three candidates - not without uncertainty, ofinsurance -
> in
> these criteria? We would have to apply others?
>
> Finally, with respect to the proposal done for some hours so that
> ICANN staff establishes a survey with Doodle (or another method), what
> it will be as much work that cannot make it our representatives or
> coordinators?
>
> Alexander Pisanty
>
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>      Dr Alexander Pisanty
> UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
> Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732
>
> * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%82106C0C8614>
>
> * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org
> * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Carlos Side wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:16:25 -0500 > From: Carlos Side <
> cveraq en gmail.com> > To: "Spanish [ ISO-8859-1 ] LACRALO" <
> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ]
> candidates to board Icann >  > Colleagues and Friends > > In summary and if
> entendi well, we have in mind two proposals in the same one > line of
> participation that is translated in: > > 1. That one discusses in the list
> the values of the candidates and their proposals > to contribute with
> criteria to our representatives on like voting. > > 2. The mechanism for
> this aim podria initially to be discussed in this > list and sets out a
> process of internal voting to even see > tendency of the ALS of the region.
> > > If we agree we can begin to contribute? > > Greetings > > > Carlos Side
> > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing
> list > lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org >
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > >
> http://www.lacralo.or!
>  g >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/566dcc8269.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>