<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo Car";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
span.HTMLconformatoprevioCar
{mso-style-name:"HTML con formato previo Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EstiloCorreo20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'>Thanks Olivier!!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'>Kind regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'>alberto<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=ES style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'>De:</span></b><span lang=ES style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl@gih.com] <br><b>Enviado el:</b> Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 AM<br><b>Para:</b> lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; asoto@ibero-americano.org<br><b>Asunto:</b> Re: [lac-discuss-en] closed public comment 24 MAR 17<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Dear Alberto,<br><br>ALSes and At-Large members are encouraged to respond directly to the consultation by emailing: <a href="mailto:comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org">comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org</a><br><br>The deadline for direct comments is 24 March 2017 23:59 UTC<br><br>But the ALAC and the RALO leaders have also prepared comments obtained from consensus discussions. The drafts of these comments have been circulated already. The RALO comment has taken input directly from all RALOs including the work of the LACRALO working group and can be found here:<br><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5ChOPA/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5ChOPA/edit?usp=sharing</a><br><br>The ALAC Statement was drafted with several requests of input from the community and its latest draft is attached.<br><br>I understand that now both Statements are frozen - i.e. finalised, except if someone points out a factual error.<br><br>ALSes are encouraged to support the ALAC and the RALO Statements, but are also encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using the template.<br><br>Kindest regards,<br><br>Olivier<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 23/03/2017 02:09, <a href="mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org">asoto@ibero-americano.org</a> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><pre>Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the company. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> then containing the recommendations is sixteen. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> review the first draft. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> that draft, which served to comment on the document <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> contains recommendations is sixteen. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> format for review comment for comment. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> on it. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> He gave rise to that form. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> making a general comment, not particularly about each <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> freedom of opinion. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre> The link in question: <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> &lt; <a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub</a> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf&gt; <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ</a> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a><o:p></o:p></pre></div></body></html>