<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">Nah, that does not matter. Note instead the terminology now introduced; a '<i>perceived conflict of interest</i>'. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">I know weasel words when I see them, in English or Spanish.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">So now, one is left to ask who was the agent for this perception? How was it developed? And what measures were used to qualify the perception?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">And given the facts as we now know them, what measures were employed to disabuse the 'perception'? </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">-Carlton Samuels</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><br>==============================<br>Carlton A Samuels<br>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br><i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i><br>=============================</div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jacqueline Morris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com" target="_blank">jam@jacquelinemorris.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi</div><div>I think there's some confusion. We have had a couple of consensus polls, in 2008 it was an objection to a single nomination, as it is here.</div><div>In the other cases, it was because the teleconference was not quorate, and the list is a quorum, so the consensus poll was done to ensure that the decision was quorate. These cases are different on the face, and so should not serve as precedent for this case.</div><div>The only precedent to be considered should be the 2008 one. </div><div>Sincerely</div><div>Jacqueline Morris</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div><div>Jacqueline A. Morris</div><div>Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. (after <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12px;line-height:16px;word-spacing:2px"><a href="http://twitter.com/chrislehmann" target="_blank">Chris Lehmann</a> )</span></div><div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org" target="_blank">asoto@ibero-americano.org</a>></span> wrote:<br></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]<br>
<br>
Subject: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????<br></span>
From: <a href="mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org" target="_blank">asoto@ibero-americano.org</a><div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
Dear, this is part of the mail where porqudel process explicel<br>
Voting:<br>
<br>
<br>
Now I want to remind you that last year we were Humberto and I, mechanics<br>
applicants. We should do votaciny accept the result. There were those who<br>
voted no, others abstained and others voted yes.<br>
<br>
<br>
The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, unique candidate for ALAC<br>
Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent.<br>
<br>
<br>
Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need<br>
make choice for that position.<br>
<br>
<br>
We pre-meeting with the staff and then taken the decision<br>
Lance was advised that the ballot will be made, taking as a precedent the case<br>
Natalia Enciso.<br>
<br>
<br>
ARE ongoing process and finalizarcon the ballot.<br>
<br>
<br>
This is the mail sent before the end of the votaciny on which<br>
no prior knowledge recibiningn comment is the result:<br>
<br>
<br>
Before the results of the current survey on whether or not<br>
Lance Hinds should be confirmed as the ALAC Representative 2015-2017<br>
LACRALO would like us to establish the methodology to be utilizarpara<br>
determine the results.<br>
<br>
<br>
Whether a majority (over 50%) of the respondents to the<br>
survey, not counting abstentions indicated NO, then the process<br>
of selection of the seat currently occupied by Ftima ALAC Cambronero<br>
reiniciarcon a new call for applications.<br>
<br>
<br>
Otherwise, the appointment of Lance Hinds is confirmed as LACRALO<br>
ALAC member for 2015-2017.<br>
<br>
<br>
Remember that each RALO ALAC should choose its Member; thus<br>
we have made a choice according explained, taking three background<br>
Similar and applications for several members that were conducted in the<br>
meeting in Buenos Aires, who felt that the process was<br>
incomplete.<br>
<br>
<br>
In the interest of transparency, we reported before the result of the<br>
Voting next steps.<br>
<br>
<br>
In this regard we believe that it has complied with the report and why<br>
It corresponds to open a new period of postulacin, presentaciny ballot.<br>
<br>
<br>
It is worth remembering that there are many situations that do not expressly estn<br>
regulated as quisiramos. We must adopt a position basndonos<br>
in the rules and precedents that have. When there is a situation<br>
expressly regulated, we must choose one of the alternatives, reporting<br>
prior to the community.<br>
<br>
<br>
This is rational only solution we have found to solve this<br>
such drawbacks.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
best regards<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Alberto Soto<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.<br></div></div>
<a href="http://www.avast.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.avast.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
[[--Original text (es)<br>
<a href="http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1a1613a0f7.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1a1613a0f7.html</a><span class=""><br>
--]]<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lac-discuss-en mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org" target="_blank">lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en</a><br>
</span></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
lac-discuss-en mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org">lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>