[lac-discuss-en] Posición de LACRALO

Mon Feb 18 19:23:10 UTC 2019

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
[[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]]

Subject:Re:  Posición de LACRALO
Desde:Eduardo Mendez <eduardomendez at protonmail.com>

Greetings, comrades, I hope you are well!

The evidence systematically collected by different organizations in Venezuela gives an account of what seems to be a habitual practice of the ISP. In this sense, I take advantage of the discussion to raise reasonable doubts about the role of this space and the different organizations that comprise it in order to provide users with the information and tools necessary to protect their digital integrity and online security.

I understand that ALSs have been proposed here with that commitment and to a lesser extent as sounding boards for ICANN regulations, laws and procedures if they are not for the benefit of the end users, which ultimately keep the network alive.

We would be doing a disservice to the ecosystem if, in this privileged space, we do not review and support the activity of the organizations that make it up, as well as the tools available to disseminate and educate users about the threats mentioned.

I leave links where the incidents are detailed:

https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/Phishing_impulsado_por_gobierno_de_Venezuela/
https://www.aporrea.org/actualidad/n338482.html
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/d3mdxm/venezuela-government-hack-activists-phishing?utm_source=mbtwitter

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

------- Original Message -------
On Monday, February 18, 2019 16:22, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sergio,

I apologize for the delay, this weekend I was not in a place with good Internet connection.

Step to answer your concerns:
1. Prove that Cantv is blocking

I copy below, a list of links where different organizations have been reporting the blockades by CANTV, the vesinfilter links have all the technical details of the blocks. The most recent blockade affected the aporrea.org platform.

2. That you denounce the systematic elimination of accounts related to the Venezuelan government in social networks (RRSS)

In the scope of ICANN social networks are not found, however, through ISOC Venezuela we are available to denounce this fact, as long as the aforementioned accounts are real, and not robot accounts.

3.To denounce those who incite violence through the RRSS, an offense contemplated in local legislation on social media, including electronic media

Although for this the Venezuelan courts are, to which I have urged to always go to the National Government, especially the regulatory body (CONATEL), I spent about 6 years (between 2010 and 2016) holding forums where it included the teaching of local legislation, and the management of messages of incitement to violence, not just politics.I have always stated that we should not say in a social network what we are not willing to say in a public square, and to assume the legal consequences of doing so.

4. That you join the complaints, increasingly frequent and scandalous, of illegal use of data

Again, it is not ICANN's scope, however, here I can have my differences with what we consider an illegal use of the data.If we are talking about hacking information, for the fraudulent use of email accounts, commercial sites, etc., you are absolutely right, I have not actively joined the complaint of them, nor the request that Venezuela join to the Budapest Convention.If we are talking about the "misuse" that social media companies are making of our data, I think this should be worked on in two aspects, education, of which I have done a lot in particular, teaching people why social networks are " free ", and Legislation, where more than 10 years ago we promoted the Habeas Data Law, and then the modification of the law on computer crimes.

However, if I consider a debate that addresses the convergence of telecommunications and the media, since the telcos have local regulations and the influence of the contents circulating on the Internet is increasing without standards that impact them.

<---- I believe that Local, Regional and World IGFs are a space for this, as well as spaces such as ITU and ICANN have been addressing these issues.

Lastly, I am still working in the state telecommunications company but I no longer occupy managerial positions. <- That's why I said that you had been

In fact, with Pisanty we talked in London about the incompatibility, I made a commitment with him to resign and, as you know, who presides Internauta Venezuela is Harold Arcos. <- Likewise, I am aware that the President of Internauta Venezuela is Harold Arcos, and that currently you are not in his board.

regards

Ricardo Holmquist

Below the links offered in point 1

I highlight the most interesting, detailed or serious ones with *

State phishing using DNS spoofing and DNS injection (interception of DNS requests leaving the network with responses forged by middleboxes)
*** Phishing promoted by the Venezuelan government puts activists and internet users at risk ***
https://securelist.com/dns-manipulation-in-venezuela/89592/
Blockade of wikipedia, CANTV SNI Filtering
***http://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/wikipedia_2019-01/ *** 
*** From the blocking of Wikipedia to Social Media: Venezuela's Political Crisis ***
Extensive locks abusing the DNS system:
***https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/state_of_internet_censorship_2018-08-16/ *** 
https://ooni.torproject.org/post/venezuela-internet-censorship/ (alternative link)
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/resumen_preliminar_2017-06-28/
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/bloqueos_abril_2017/
***https://ipysvenezuela.org/2017/01/18/navegar-con-libertad/ *** 
https://globalvoices.org/2017/07/03/with-facebook-twitter-and-youtube-blocked-venezuelans-share-tech-advice/
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/25/venezuela_increases_censorship_surveillance/
http://efectococuyo.com/apoyo-al-periodismo/bloqueo-a-la-patilla-es-una-violacion-directa-a-la-libertad-de-expresion-denuncia-el-cnp/
https://panampost.com/pedro-garcia/2016/07/20/censorship-in-venezuela-over-370-internet-addresses-blocked/
https://es.globalvoices.org/2017/04/07/aumentan-las-protestas-censuran-sitios-web-y-de-television-en-venezuela/
https://twitter.com/vesinfiltro/status/829376747019837440
https://twitter.com/vesinfiltro/status/850366872889548800
Tor Lock (built-in connection options)
***https://ooni.torproject.org/post/venezuela-internet-censorship/ (same previous link) 
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/state_of_internet_censorship_2018-08-16/ (same previous link) 
https://www.accessnow.org/venezuela-blocks-tor/
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/25/17503680/venezuela-tor-blocked-web-censorship
https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3034821/venezuelan-government-blocks-access-to-tor-to-censor-the-news
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/CANTV_bloquea_Tor_2017-06-26/
Repeated blockages to platforms with streaming, including YouTube affecting services such as gmial and gogole drive
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/2019-02-12-resumen/
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/twitter_youtube_instagram_2019-01/
***https://netblocks.org/reports/disruptions-in-venezuela-affecting-youtube-and-other-services-during-political-rally-WJBZda86
***https://netblocks.org/reports/venezuela-national-assembly-live-streams-disrupted-4M8JQvy0
Some other analysis about blockages:
***https://medium.com/dfrlab/protests-go-viral-in-venezuela-28491d3f4a94
https://netblocks.org/reports/venezuela-humanitarian-aid-platform-blocked-GnAgJk8p
https://www.derechosdigitales.org/12791/venezuela-que-esta-pasando-con-los-bloqueos-en-internet/
Communications from regional and national organizations:
https://vesinfiltro.com/noticias/comunicado_regional_2017-05-26/
https://isocvenezuela.org/noticias/comunicado-sobre-el-bloqueo-de-tor-y-sitios-web-en-venezuela/
https://isocvenezuela.org/noticias/isoc-esta-profundamente-preocupada-por-los-bloqueos-de-internet-en-venezuela/

Fri., Feb. 15 2019 at 18:42, Sergio Bronstein ( <bronstein.sergio at gmail.com> ) wrote:
Hi Ricardo

How good it would be:
1. Prove that Cantv is blocking
two.That you denounce the systematic elimination of accounts related to the Venezuelan government in social networks (RRSS)
3. That they denounce those who incite violence through the RRSS, an offense contemplated in the local legislation on social communication media, including electronic
4. That you join the complaints, increasingly frequent and scandalous, of illegal use of data

However, if I consider a debate that addresses the convergence of telecommunications and the media, since the telcos have local regulations and the influence of the contents circulating on the Internet is increasing without standards that impact them.

I do not know if these are themes of Lacralo, but I'm sure that as associations of users we should address them.

Lastly, I am still working in the state telecommunications company but I no longer occupy managerial positions. In fact, with Pisanty we talked in London about the incompatibility, I made a commitment with him to resign and, as you know, who presides Internauta Venezuela is Harold Arcos.

Hugs for all,
Sergio Bronstein

On Fri, 2/15/2019 1:04 PM, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alberto,
I believe that asking Harold Arcos to pronounce himself, because he lives in Venezuela, is to disqualify the work of those in Venezuela, including Alejandro Acosta, and who is Director of ISOC Venezuela.

To put in context what is happening now, the main ISP of Venezuela (with more than 70% of the fixed connections, and 40% of the mobile connections) is blocking the different platforms of social networks at the time of issuance of any message from opposition spokespersons, being in Venezuela this is virtually the only way to broadcast a message, since television, radio and newspapers are already prohibited from giving voice to opposition spokespersons. This block does it through DNS locks, affecting its operation. There are serious studies of what is happening.

Last week the opposition launched a volunteer platform, the aforementioned ISP took an additional step, and redirected the DNS of the volunteer platform, twice, to two different sites, committing several crimes under Venezuelan law. Among them phising and DNS spoofing. Crimes both condemned worldwide and included in the Budapest Convention, (of which Venezuela unfortunately is not a signatory).

This ISP is owned by the government of Venezuela.

The previous representative (and even a member) of Internauta Venezuela is (or was) a manager of this company.

Up to now, worldwide, we considered phising as a cyber crime, where we have dealt as individuals and as institutions to warn users of this practice, since it is generally carried out to commit crimes, especially financial ones.

Our concern is that it is the Government, through one of its companies, that is carrying out these crimes.
Who defends the user?

The least we expect from LACRALO is a communiqué condemning the crimes of DNS spoofing (and any type of cyber crimes), since they threaten the stability of the network.

regards

Ricardo Holmquist

Fri., Feb. 15 2019 at 16:33, Alberto Soto ( <alberto at soto.net.ar> ) wrote:

Well, I'd like to hear from Harold Arcos, who lives there and is our representative.

Best regards

Alberto Soto

On February 15, 2019, at 2:11 am, Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Tocayo,

You have no idea how much I appreciate your comments. Unfortunately in this email I will not point to anyone specifically.

I would like to mention (in the same context of ideas), that I received communications from several people who in private showed some possibility of at least one letter or mention by some ALS or with much luck of LACRALO, I hope so.

I take the opportunity to indicate that despite having many years in the middle (> two decades) I consider myself quite new in this world of LACRALO. However, I am no stranger to his work and I have always felt a deep respect for several of my friends who have passed through here.

Today a person from ICANN sent an email to another list and it had written -among other things- "to help guarantee a global, unified, stable and secure Internet". In my super humble opinion I feel that LACRALO does not follow these words. Ojo, I do not want to criticize the current chair or any, not least the previous ones, I even put myself in this bag too ..., I just feel that something can be done and that our duty is to do it.

What can be done?.

1) Identify countries, cities, people where the Internet is not free, unified, secure, etc., etc.

2) The same of countries "that break" Internet, DNS, etc., etc.

3) Countries that do not comply with a, b, c, d of cybersecurity

4) Much more

aha, they identified
then what? ..., contact, teach, move with them, converse, TAKE a position, offer a hand, etc., etc.

I am going to extend myself a little more .., eye, once again I recognize that I have very little experience in LACRALO, what I am going to say is not necessarily "achievable"

- LACRALO probably wants to discuss technical topics but they focus on the political (I talk about the politically correct and / or get involved)

- When it's not something political you want to take to the economic (my thinking reviewing the history of the list .., I reviewed hundreds of messages)

What I feel with the last two points is that they place a giant stone to advance in some points.

Gentlemen, what LACRALO does (and does not do) has a VERY big impact on the Internet of Latam.The only thing that we are all looking for is a better Internet in each country of our region,

Regards,

Alexander,

PS Finally, regarding the involvement of the workplace of one of our representatives, I dare not say anything at this time.

On 2/14/19 at 20:26, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:
Dear Alejandro Acosta,

I see as surely as you do, with sadness, the silence that has followed our communications.

A review of the forensic analysis of the DNS phishing and redirecting incident that we are discussing, and that has been widely published, indicates that the workplace of one of our regional representatives is directly involved in the operation. This requires, at least, a clarification, given that the event has given rise to very strong complaints from users in the country in question. It would be difficult to consider them represented in these terms.

Alejandro Pisanty

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:12 PM Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan at unam.mx> wrote:
Dear Alejandro Acosta,

I agree in general with Vanda's position that it is not appropriate for LACRALO or ICANN to express us regarding a phishing incident, although the one in question is an incident that is not aimed at causing patrimonial damage (in that case it would be a crime and not a political act).

Where I think we should deepen is in the fact that we report an incident that manipulates the resolution of names in the DNS at the level of a ccTLD or an operator very close to it, that is, with the potential to affect all users Internet of a country in its rights.This would be even more important insofar as the organization that carried out this activity had representatives in our community, who would have to explain the aforementioned measures in terms compatible with their role as representatives of the users.

This possibility underscores the importance of ALSs and their representatives declaring their interests in relation to actors other than users, such as ISPs and ccTLD operators and other registries.

Alejandro Pisanty

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr.Alejandro Pisanty
School of Chemistry UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico,http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

________________________________________
From: lac-discuss-es [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alejandro Acosta [alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com]
Posted on: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 10:03 AM
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Position of LACRALO

Sirs,

A query:
until when LACRALO is going to turn a blind eye
(understand ignoring) Web page locks, URLs, DNS and a thousand other things
that happen in our region every day.Be careful, I do not say that LACRALO
You have to make fix the problem but take a position.

And before they tell me it's not something related to DNS, IF THERE IS
a lot of DNS included in all this. By the way, let's remember the slogan:
"One world, one Internet"

Regards,

Alexander,

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
School of Chemistry UNAM
Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico,http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

------- Original Message -------
On Monday, February 18, 2019 16:22, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sergio,
I apologize for the delay, this weekend I was not in a place with good Internet connection.

Step to answer your concerns:
1. Prove that Cantv is blocking

I copy below, a list of links where different organizations have been reporting the blockades by CANTV, the vesinfilter links have all the technical details of the blocks. The most recent blockade affected the aporrea.org platform.
2. That you denounce the systematic elimination of accounts related to the Venezuelan government in social networks (RRSS)
In the scope of ICANN social networks are not found, however, through ISOC Venezuela we are available to denounce this fact, as long as the aforementioned accounts are real, and not robot accounts.
3.To denounce those who incite violence through the RRSS, an offense contemplated in local legislation on social media, including electronic media
Although for this the Venezuelan courts are, to which I have urged to always go to the National Government, especially the regulatory body (CONATEL), I spent about 6 years (between 2010 and 2016) holding forums where it included the teaching of local legislation, and the management of messages of incitement to violence, not just politics.I have always stated that we should not say in a social network what we are not willing to say in a public square, and to assume the legal consequences of doing so.
4. That you join the complaints, increasingly frequent and scandalous, of illegal use of data
Again, it is not ICANN's scope, however, here I can have my differences with what we consider an illegal use of the data. If we are talking about hacking information, for the fraudulent use of email accounts, commercial sites, etc., you are absolutely right, I have not actively joined the complaint of them, nor the request that Venezuela join to the Budapest Convention.If we are talking about the "misuse" that social media companies are making of our data, I think this should be worked on in two aspects, education, of which I have done a lot in particular, teaching people why social networks are " free ", and Legislation, where more than 10 years ago we promoted the Habeas Data Law, and then the modification of the law on computer crimes.

However, if I consider a debate that addresses the convergence of telecommunications and the media, since the telcos have local regulations and the influence of the contents circulating on the Internet is increasing without standards that impact them.
<---- I believe that Local, Regional and World IGFs are a space for this, as well as spaces such as ITU and ICANN have been addressing these issues.

Lastly, I am still working in the state telecommunications company but I no longer occupy managerial positions. <- That's why I said that you had been

In fact, with Pisanty we talked in London about the incompatibility, I made a commitment with him to resign and, as you know, who presides Internauta Venezuela is Harold Arcos. <- Likewise, I am aware that the President of Internauta Venezuela is Harold Arcos, and that currently you are not in his board.

regards
Ricardo Holmquist

Below the links offered in point 1

I highlight the most interesting, detailed or serious ones with * [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (54683> 1000 bytes)]

Fri., Feb. 152019 at 18:42, Sergio Bronstein ( <bronstein.sergio at gmail.com> ) wrote:
Hi Ricardo

How good it would be:
1. Prove that Cantv is blocking
2. That you denounce the systematic elimination of accounts related to the Venezuelan government in social networks (RRSS)
3. That they denounce those who incite violence through the RRSS, an offense contemplated in the local legislation on social communication media, including electronic
4. That you join the complaints, increasingly frequent and scandalous, of illegal use of data

However, if I consider a debate that addresses the convergence of telecommunications and the media, since the telcos have local regulations and the influence of the contents circulating on the Internet is increasing without standards that impact them.
I do not know if these are themes of Lacralo, but I'm sure that as associations of users we should address them.
Lastly, I am still working in the state telecommunications company but I no longer occupy managerial positions. In fact, with Pisanty we talked in London about the incompatibility, I made a commitment with him to resign and, as you know, who presides Internauta Venezuela is Harold Arcos.

Hugs for all,
Sergio Bronstein

On Fri, 2/15/2019 1:04 PM, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Alberto,
I believe that asking Harold Arcos to pronounce himself, because he lives in Venezuela, is to disqualify the work of those in Venezuela, including Alejandro Acosta, and who is Director of ISOC Venezuela.

To put in context what is happening now, the main ISP of Venezuela (with more than 70% of the fixed connections, and 40% of the mobile connections) is blocking the different platforms of social networks at the time of issuance of any message from opposition spokespersons, being in Venezuela this is virtually the only way to broadcast a message, since television, radio and newspapers are already prohibited from giving voice to opposition spokespersons. This block does it through DNS locks, affecting its operation. There are serious studies of what is happening.

Last week the opposition launched a volunteer platform, the aforementioned ISP took an additional step, and redirected the DNS of the volunteer platform, twice, to two different sites, committing several crimes under Venezuelan law. Among them phising and DNS spoofing. Crimes both condemned worldwide and included in the Budapest Convention, (of which Venezuela unfortunately is not a signatory).

This ISP is owned by the government of Venezuela.

The previous representative (and even a member) of Internauta Venezuela is (or was) a manager of this company.

Up to now, worldwide, we considered phising as a cyber crime, where we have dealt as individuals and as institutions to warn users of this practice, since it is generally carried out to commit crimes, especially financial ones.

Our concern is that it is the Government, through one of its companies, that is carrying out these crimes.
Who defends the user?

The least we expect from LACRALO is a communiqué condemning the crimes of DNS spoofing (and any type of cyber crimes), since they threaten the stability of the network.

regards

Ricardo Holmquist

Fri., Feb. 15 2019 at 16:33, Alberto Soto ( <alberto at soto.net.ar> ) wrote:

Well, I'd like to hear from Harold Arcos, who lives there and is our representative.

Best regards

Alberto Soto

On February 15, 2019, at 2:11 am, Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Tocayo,
You have no idea how much I appreciate your comments. Unfortunately in this email I will not point to anyone specifically.
I would like to mention (in the same context of ideas), that I received communications from several people who in private showed some possibility of at least one letter or mention by some ALS or with much luck of LACRALO, I hope so.
I take the opportunity to indicate that despite having many years in the middle (> two decades) I consider myself quite new in this world of LACRALO. However, I am no stranger to his work and I have always felt a deep respect for several of my friends who have passed through here.
Today a person from ICANN sent an email to another list and it had written -among other things- "to help guarantee a global, unified, stable and secure Internet". In my super humble opinion I feel that LACRALO does not follow these words. Ojo, I do not want to criticize the current chair or any, not least the previous ones, I even put myself in this bag too ..., I just feel that something can be done and that our duty is to do it.

What can be done?.
1) Identify countries, cities, people where the Internet is not free, unified, secure, etc., etc.
2) The same of countries "that break" Internet, DNS, etc., etc.
3) Countries that do not comply with a, b, c, d of cybersecurity
4) Much more

aha, they identified
then what? ..., contact, teach, move with them, converse, TAKE a position, offer a hand, etc., etc.

I am going to extend myself a little more .., eye, once again I recognize that I have very little experience in LACRALO, what I am going to say is not necessarily "achievable"

- LACRALO probably wants to discuss technical topics but they focus on the political (I talk about the politically correct and / or get involved)
- When it's not something political you want to take to the economic (my thinking reviewing the history of the list .., I reviewed hundreds of messages)

What I feel with the last two points is that they place a giant stone to advance in some points.
Gentlemen, what LACRALO does (and does not do) has a VERY big impact on the Internet of Latam. The only thing that we are all looking for is a better Internet in each country of our region,

Regards,

Alexander,
PS Finally, regarding the involvement of the workplace of one of our representatives, I dare not say anything at this time.

On 2/14/19 at 20:26, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:

Dear Alejandro Acosta,

I see as surely as you do, with sadness, the silence that has followed our communications.

A review of the forensic analysis of the DNS phishing and redirecting incident that we are discussing, and that has been widely published, indicates that the workplace of one of our regional representatives is directly involved in the operation. This requires, at least, a clarification, given that the event has given rise to very strong complaints from users in the country in question. It would be difficult to consider them represented in these terms.

Alejandro Pisanty

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:12 PM Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan at unam.mx> wrote:

Dear Alejandro Acosta,

I agree in general with Vanda's position that it is not appropriate for LACRALO or ICANN to express us regarding a phishing incident, although the one in question is an incident that is not aimed at causing patrimonial damage (in that case it would be a crime and not a political act).

Where I think we should deepen is in the fact that we report an incident that manipulates the resolution of names in the DNS at the level of a ccTLD or an operator very close to it, that is, with the potential to affect all users Internet of a country in its rights.This would be even more important insofar as the organization that carried out this activity had representatives in our community, who would have to explain the aforementioned measures in terms compatible with their role as representatives of the users.

This possibility underscores the importance of ALSs and their representatives declaring their interests in relation to actors other than users, such as ISPs and ccTLD operators and other registries.

Alejandro Pisanty

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr.Alejandro Pisanty
School of Chemistry UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

________________________________________
From: lac-discuss-es [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alejandro Acosta [alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com]
Posted on: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 10:03 AM
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Position of LACRALO

Sirs,

A query:
until when LACRALO is going to turn a blind eye
(understand ignoring) Web page locks, URLs, DNS and a thousand other things
that happen in our region every day. Be careful, I do not say that LACRALO
You have to make fix the problem but take a position.

And before they tell me it's not something related to DNS, IF THERE IS
a lot of DNS included in all this. By the way, let's remember the slogan:
"One world, one Internet"

Regards,

Alexander,

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
School of Chemistry UNAM
Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

[[--Original text (es)
Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7d26ae45e7.html
--]]